I would have gone long at the green X for the second leg up. MM (see blue) why? we had a reversal and I would want to see some strength from it to go long for a bigger move. In first leg the reversal was very strong. Then a PB then a high one entry where my X is at. The PB being 3 bars is a MINOR reversal with no strength. Prices likely continuing up after that bull bar because the PB is over. Going for a MM because of the strength in the first leg up in the reversal.Suppose you shorted the market early this morning, at what point would you have changed your view of market from bearish to bullish? Or at what time would you have cut the loss on short positions? Thanks!
There would have been no loss on any short I took right after the open as I would not be holding it through this strong reversal.
As to where I would have exited a short position that I might have taken right after the open. I am out on that second bull bar after the big bear bar and the smaller bear bar. Bulls are pushing back. It could just be a PB or it could be a reversal? So I am locking in profits on my short. If it ends up being a PB and trend south resumes guess what? I enter short again. If it ends up being a reversal (which it did) I am bullish by the time that first leg ends and looking for a long entry such as described above and marked with the green X. Look how strong that first leg was. The high of that first green leg almost erased the ENTIRE opening bearish move. Some institutional bull are buying! Second leg is most likely. Mom and Pop traders cannot push this market up like this. This is nothing less than institutions. By this chart I would have done well locking in my profit and not holding for a possible PB and resumption of the trend.