Technical Strategy
- Thread starter Tums
- Start date
Thanks for all the feedback, Jack.
D - stall, hitch, dip
ND - FBP, FTP, SP, LF, LM
Had something unexpected to attend to post RTH, so have been unable to do the Spyder chart comparison debrief - will catch up on this tomorrow.
Incidentally at work tomorrow (and Thursday) so will be unable to continue real-time until Wednesday.
Thoughts...
A day at work, and I return to the bootcamp energized, revitalized, and ready to continue my onward journey.
I realized how I had been riding the pendulum, from many angles; from too many trades, to too few; in traverse construction, from paucity to excess; in logging, from redundancy to insufficiency; in academic responsiveness, from dull to brazen, and in curiosity, from too little to too much. A formidable prospect to teach!
Unbelievably, the purpose of logging - a distillation of the marketâs message, after passing through perceptual filters â had eluded me. The vessel to accelerate unconscious information uptake and subsequent mind-building and differentiation.
Preflight checks, designed to provide inter-day cohesion and clarity, yet I failed to carry over sequences, overlap channels or respect sync.
Three fractals. I had constructed traverses within (!) chubby tapes, and mistaken âfaster fractal traversesâ for the genuine article by misapplication of Gaussians and the seven cases.
Certainty. I had not consistently acted with certain finite Monitoring subsets, nor acknowledged that the time at which you know that you know varies from bar to bar.
Finally invention. A vivid imagination and a lifetime of positive cultural reinforcement have obviously embedded invention as a first recourse. Whatâs more, by associating it, intimately, with my purpose for being, I had elevated it to a mystic pedestal, as a glowing ideal to aspire to.
Whereby the process in the journals is serial differentiation, building a bedrock foundation in Monitoring before progressing to complete the skill set, the process being utilized here is parallel differentiation, building a gestalt of synergistic mental pathways, an immensely powerful and accelerated process, yet one which requires a helmsman who can navigate through stormy seas.
A day at work, and I return to the bootcamp energized, revitalized, and ready to continue my onward journey.
I realized how I had been riding the pendulum, from many angles; from too many trades, to too few; in traverse construction, from paucity to excess; in logging, from redundancy to insufficiency; in academic responsiveness, from dull to brazen, and in curiosity, from too little to too much. A formidable prospect to teach!
Unbelievably, the purpose of logging - a distillation of the marketâs message, after passing through perceptual filters â had eluded me. The vessel to accelerate unconscious information uptake and subsequent mind-building and differentiation.
Preflight checks, designed to provide inter-day cohesion and clarity, yet I failed to carry over sequences, overlap channels or respect sync.
Three fractals. I had constructed traverses within (!) chubby tapes, and mistaken âfaster fractal traversesâ for the genuine article by misapplication of Gaussians and the seven cases.
Certainty. I had not consistently acted with certain finite Monitoring subsets, nor acknowledged that the time at which you know that you know varies from bar to bar.
Finally invention. A vivid imagination and a lifetime of positive cultural reinforcement have obviously embedded invention as a first recourse. Whatâs more, by associating it, intimately, with my purpose for being, I had elevated it to a mystic pedestal, as a glowing ideal to aspire to.
Whereby the process in the journals is serial differentiation, building a bedrock foundation in Monitoring before progressing to complete the skill set, the process being utilized here is parallel differentiation, building a gestalt of synergistic mental pathways, an immensely powerful and accelerated process, yet one which requires a helmsman who can navigate through stormy seas.
)Working through the preflight check for tomorrow... can anyone tell me what gradient (a) (b) (c) and (d) refer to in Part 3, Channel Slope?
Also, just a clarification. Would VEs of the first dominant traverse of a channel be considered channel VEs and traverse VEs, or purely channel VEs?
TIA.
Also, just a clarification. Would VEs of the first dominant traverse of a channel be considered channel VEs and traverse VEs, or purely channel VEs?
TIA.