Here is a reference chart that shows three panes: annotated price on three nested fractals, volume and annotated volume pattern to match the price pattern.
Volume is either dom or non dom as you build the pattern fractal by fractal. I use slope of the lines that go from Peaks to Troughs.
This illustrates the difference between the OODA betting in an up down environment (See traderzones classic dum dum dum dum dum dum post where he points out his up/done syndrome of CW) from the MADA pattern combo of 3 price moves for 4 volume moves.
This illustrates how minds are built one way of another. The critical thinking element is the condieration of dom and non dom volume moves.
In terms of MLR or RTM thinking there is the issue of regression to the MLR mean or what precedes it, movement AWAY from the mean. Dominance is what moves it away and non dominace it what moves it towards. this is a volume measure that is simulated with price points usually (an indirect measure of regression using an altenate variable to the principal variable involved.)
Pragmatically all of this for OODA tradrs is the source of the negative emotions proven by research to be associtated with OODA trading. the cure, so far, is professional theapy and setting a success standard far from the market's offer. this will prevail for the forseeable future, luckily. As a consequence, in Larry Harris, there is an established heirarchy of trader styles.
MADA fits in under speculation and its sub classes that deal with parasitic things which include anticipation and technical analysis. This puts MADA as a subset in a place where binary logic applied in an information context of non probabilistic information theory. All of this related to the deductive thinking of the Scientific Method. All of PEP and its applications are designed to minimize risk while optimizing taking the market's offer. Consequently noise and anomalies are not present.
OODA is often described s having a kindred relationship to poker. Poker is inductive in nature and involves risk taking to win or lose.
Volume is either dom or non dom as you build the pattern fractal by fractal. I use slope of the lines that go from Peaks to Troughs.
This illustrates the difference between the OODA betting in an up down environment (See traderzones classic dum dum dum dum dum dum post where he points out his up/done syndrome of CW) from the MADA pattern combo of 3 price moves for 4 volume moves.
This illustrates how minds are built one way of another. The critical thinking element is the condieration of dom and non dom volume moves.
In terms of MLR or RTM thinking there is the issue of regression to the MLR mean or what precedes it, movement AWAY from the mean. Dominance is what moves it away and non dominace it what moves it towards. this is a volume measure that is simulated with price points usually (an indirect measure of regression using an altenate variable to the principal variable involved.)
Pragmatically all of this for OODA tradrs is the source of the negative emotions proven by research to be associtated with OODA trading. the cure, so far, is professional theapy and setting a success standard far from the market's offer. this will prevail for the forseeable future, luckily. As a consequence, in Larry Harris, there is an established heirarchy of trader styles.
MADA fits in under speculation and its sub classes that deal with parasitic things which include anticipation and technical analysis. This puts MADA as a subset in a place where binary logic applied in an information context of non probabilistic information theory. All of this related to the deductive thinking of the Scientific Method. All of PEP and its applications are designed to minimize risk while optimizing taking the market's offer. Consequently noise and anomalies are not present.
OODA is often described s having a kindred relationship to poker. Poker is inductive in nature and involves risk taking to win or lose.