For what is worth, Surf and I made a trading bet. My rationale was using TA and he will lose that bet, no question about it.
For what is worth, Surf and I made a trading bet. My rationale was using TA and he will lose that bet
you use trendlines and patterns etc?"Technical Analysis"... is a study of "buying and selling"... what players are ACTUALLY DOING WITH THEIR MONEY.
Isn't that a trader's objective... to be in tune with whatever the mass of buyers or sellers are doing? Isn't that what moves prices?
LOL, if AD is who I think he is... then you are spot on...I hope Technical Analysis wins.
![]()
you use trendlines and patterns etc?
thanks
LOL, if AD is who I think he is... then you are spot on...
Well, I've won a national investing "real money" championship (and nearly won 3 other times)... and have taken around $100 Million from the markets for myself and clients... all using "price chart TA"... of course I should be regarded as "irrelevant" according to Mayer's Law*... because few want to believe what I do actually works. (sarcasm, of course)
I get it! You've got a strong opinion. What you DON'T know is that your opinion is WRONG because you don't understand!!
I know you've made good money over the years, as you're still in business... but I suspect you could have made a lot more with a little "tweaking to your thinking".
(For all of you viewing this thread... Surf and I have a connection. He has a much larger operation than mine, and I've sold him a few workstation computers... he can use lots of computers, I need only a few. I respect that he's made money (there is more than one way to "skin the market's cat"), but his disagreement about what I do is ALL WRONG. I suspect he'd make a LOT more money if he listened to me and understood TA as I do. However... if you've been successful, it's difficult to adopt anything other... thinking others who don't do what you do, "don't get it".)
* A corollary to Murphy's Law... which states, "If the theory is not supported by the facts, they will be disregarded".
I'm a smart guy, and proud of it! I graduated Summa Cum Laude (3.97/4.0 GPA) in science.. Chemistry and Biology primarily. One of the benefits of an education in science is the development of one's deductive reasoning abilities. (Like when Sherlock Holmes was asked... "What exactly is it that you do, Mr. Holmes?" He replied, "I observe and deduce". I cannot overemphasize how relevant that statement is to trading the financial markets.)
There is nothing to debate. Proper TA analysis works like "finding money in the street". If you don't believe that, it's because you don't "get it".
I understand you have a different approach/belief.. though I don't know exactly what that is... but your disdain of "proper TA" is totally off base.
"Technical Analysis"... is a study of "buying and selling"... what players are ACTUALLY DOING WITH THEIR MONEY.
Isn't that a trader's objective... to be in tune with whatever the mass of buyers or sellers are doing? Isn't that what moves prices?