Teacher Fired for not using Pronoun

[exGOPer]

No. Because it’s illogical to conflate them.
Which he did.
Logic free ‘thinking’ is the hallmark of a Leftard.

LOL, a Trumptard lecturing on 'logic'.

First, I didn't conflate the two, I pointed out your double standards on trying to falsely prove that a woman is a man, calling her a man against her wishes but you are quick to defend some inbred hick who refuses to call someone their choice of pronouns EVEN AFTER surgery. Shows how you only want to demean and insult people because of your inherent inherited insecurity about your own little dick.

 

[El OchoCinco]

Oddly enough, I agree with you. If an employee doesn't want to follow the rules his employer sets, he can find a different job. That's the way the world works.

That's why I don't have an issue with NFL owners cutting players if they refuse to stand for the national anthem after being told not to kneel. The owners have every right to cut them if they don't comply with the rules the organization sets.

The NFL does not give a shit about the anthem they give a shit about winning and making money. If Pat Mahomes or Ezekiel Elliott kneeled they would not be cut.

 

[LacesOut]

LOL, a Trumptard lecturing on 'logic'.

First, I didn't conflate the two, I pointed out your double standards on trying to falsely prove that a woman is a man, calling her a man against her wishes but you are quick to defend some inbred hick who refuses to call someone their choice of pronouns EVEN AFTER surgery. Shows how you only want to demean and insult people because of your inherent inherited insecurity about your own little dick.

I’m not trying to falsely prove a woman’s a man. You idiot. Michelle’s cock is mostly a joke. Mostly. Just like you saying Trump is a a pedophile without, you know, any evidence of him actually being a pedophile except some fake news stories that don’t prove anything.

Freedom of speech. Freedom of expression. Stuff that matters not to leftists.

Guy works for government. In a private work environment, it might be challengable.
If you read the article you might understand it.
Here’s your precedent.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-farris-nifla-vs-becerra-20180627-story.html

 

[exGOPer]

I’m not trying to falsely prove a woman’s a man. You idiot. Michelle’s cock is mostly a joke. Mostly. Just like you saying Trump is a a pedophile without, you know, any evidence of him actually being a pedophile except some fake news stories that don’t prove anything.

Freedom of speech. Freedom of expression. Stuff that matters not to leftists.

Guy works for government. In a private work environment, it might be challengable.
If you read the article you might understand it.
Here’s your precedent.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-farris-nifla-vs-becerra-20180627-story.html

Ya ya, it was a joke bro!

And I have evidence to prove that Trump is a pedophile unlike your bullshit about Michelle. Video evidence and him admitting on tape isn't 'fake news'. Ask me to cite it, I am happy to oblige and even run a poll to clear up the terminology.

So no court has called it constitutional but he 'might' challenge it means you have given the verdict already.

Try harder, do better, your trolling is trash tier.

 

[LacesOut]

No dum dum.
There is precedent with respect to compelled speech.
“
The U.S. Supreme Court has long been solicitous for our nation’s first liberty, free speech — widely understood to include the choice of what not to say.

On Tuesday, the court reminded us that this principle endures. Its 5-4 decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates vs. Becerra stopped the state of California from forcing faith-based pregnancy centers to provide free advertising for abortion clinics“

 

[exGOPer]

No dum dum.
There is precedent with respect to compelled speech.
“
The U.S. Supreme Court has long been solicitous for our nation’s first liberty, free speech — widely understood to include the choice of what not to say.

On Tuesday, the court reminded us that this principle endures. Its 5-4 decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates vs. Becerra stopped the state of California from forcing faith-based pregnancy centers to provide free advertising for abortion clinics“

Not even close to being relevant to the case but nice try with the BS.

 

[LacesOut]

Not even close to being relevant to the case but nice try with the BS.

Both are about compelled speech.
Critical thinking is hard for Libtards.

 

[gwb-trading]

Should the government dictate what I need to call somebody?

 

[exGOPer]

Both are about compelled speech.
Critical thinking is hard for Libtards.

A Trumptard shouldn't lecture others on 'critical thinking'.

And no such protection applies to employees

Judge Kennedy wrote “When public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes. . .”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcetti_v._Ceballos

Try again inbred, defend your bigots like a proper Saudi Wahabi Jihadi Muslim lover like yourself.

 

[exGOPer]

Should the government dictate what I need to call somebody?

Only if you work for the government as an employee and the calling is part of your job