Not true!
These sort stocks you describe, do you think you are the only one to recognise the FA value and then buying and holding? No, a trillion other fundamentalists have seen it too and the price is already baked in.
Lets go one step further, you mention ".... throw in a smart CEO.... and FA will win every time."
Pffffffffp. These sort stocks are dime a dozen amongst those 'hunting for a bargain' those rock solid as it were fundamentally sound stocks are plodders. (Think of a donkey).
If you want bang for bucks, the best outstanding ones have no fundamentals, they rise on greed and speculation, they fly to the moon - then crash - but you gotta GTFO fast, that's trading.
Mickey,
There's a difference between trading and investing, and of course I know you know that.
Trading, as you pointed out.... yeah, you have to be quick. $SHOT this week was a perfect example of that. Do fundamentals have anything to do with the intraday or multi-day movement that can be traded(?)... absolutely not.
You said this:
"These sort stocks you describe, do you think you are the only one to recognise the FA value and then buying and holding? No, a trillion other fundamentalists have seen it too and the price is already baked in."
Of course I'm not the only one to spot this--duh. But what makes a company's stock price increase over time? The company grows, it makes more money per given share. Growth
is baked in, that's exactly why different companies trade at different PE ratios and PEG ratio's. If you want quality, you have to pay more. But being "baked into the price already" doesn't mean the stock isn't going up over time. Far from it. Here's a great example:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/nvidia-the-next-great-tech-stock.305398/#post-4379800
Chipotles is another great example. It opened around $40 on the first day of trading. I got in, lost money, got back in, and made money, closing at $62. It was a simple to understand business model, and the stores were friggin packed. And as you pointed out "a trillion other fundamentalists" saw it too.
I would be willing to bet, had you taken the minimum PDT amount of $25K and bought the day I sold @ $62... between then and now, the money you have made (or lost?) using that $25K chasing intraday movements on stocks that aren't worth the paper they're written on... would pale in comparison to what you have made holding CMG as those "trillion other fundamentalists" joined the party. Your $25K would now be worth $899,000. Did your $25K make that much since 2007?
Sure, that's a cherry picked example, but one I am personally familiar with. Another one comes to mind, Quanta Services. Certainly no CMG, but 500%+ over 6 years.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/quanta-services.312653/
Hey, I do dozens of round trip trades daily, and fundy's have absolutely nothing to do with anything... I realize that. But I also invest for the long term using quality stocks.... and even at that, I have screwed up by getting in and out based on my view of the greater tide. My returns in those accounts would be far better... by a longshot... had I just bought, forgot, and used dividend reinvestment. Now we're talking a 25 year time-frame here... but still.
Ya know Warren Buffett... if he read your post.... he would fall down laughing (and probably break a few ribs or something at this point) because Berkshire is the quinessential example of what I speak. Now you're entitled to your opinion, but history is on my side here.