Sweden's awesome liberal and socialist eutopia coming to an end.

[piezoe]

Oh, I can read, so you assumed correctly. All I said is that you have no idea what is truly going on in Sweden. All you do is quote stats from your couch. How many Swedes have you spoken to?

Since all you like to do is read, break out a bit from your Propublica paradigm and read some alternative views. This guy is a good start.

https://twitter.com/PeterSweden7?lang=en

Ha ha ha very good. It was like reading something you would write. No wonder you like that . If you had 2 rapes last year and 6 this this year that's a 300% percent increase! Oh my god. Rape is rampant. Always look to see how big the denominator is whenever your given a percent figure. And never use one year to the next data as an indicator of trend. You could be looking at an outlier or one of a kind event. The data coming from Sweden makes my point.
There is a clearly an increase in the crime numbers, but its also clearly still one of the safest countries in the world.
What you want is the same thing Trump wants. A way to blame anything bad on people that are different from you. Well have you ever thought about how bad it is to think the way you and Trump do. We need some statistics on that. It seems we have them, and bad thinking is on the rise. Yikes!

 

[Tsing Tao]

Ha ha ha very good. It was like reading something you would write. No wonder you like that . If you had 2 rapes last year and 6 this this year that's a 300% percent increase! Oh my god. Rape is rampant. Always look to see how big the denominator is whenever your given a percent figure. And never use one year to the next data as an indicator of trend. You could be looking at an outlier or one of a kind event. The data coming from Sweden makes my point.
There is a clearly an increase in the crime numbers, but its also clearly still one of the safest countries in the world.
What you want is the same thing Trump wants. A way to blame anything bad on people that are different from you. Well have you ever thought about how bad it is to think the way you and Trump do. We need some statistics on that. It seems we have them, and bad thinking is on the rise. Yikes!

So you're saying that Sweden had only 2 rapes last year?

 

[TJustice]

Your response was a rambling nonsense. If you wish to have serious conversation drop the distractions.

I suggest we could begin here:
1. Let us examine the Fed's founding documents and laws and the the updates.
2. Let us discuss what happens when the Fed creates money by putting money into a readily liquefiable account using a key stroke.

h ha ha in the same way that you own a bank you acquire a CD from. All they would have to do is change the name from CD to "stock". Next time you go for a CD ask the banker to cross out "CD" and write in "Stock" that should do it. Then you can have full ownership rights in the Bank. You'll be in the bucks!!! The only thing you'll be missing is your share of the bank's profits, just like the Fed member banks don't get any share of the Branch banks profits, except their statutory dividend. Since these private banks "own the Fed" I think we are cheating them don't you.

 

[piezoe]

Let us examine the Fed's founding documents and laws and the the updates.

Let us not. That all changed in the early 1930s

Let us discuss what happens when the Fed creates money by putting money into a readily liquefiable account using a key stroke.

The employees of the Fed system do that nightly, both directions. in and out of reserve accounts, with a key stroke. Does this scare you? It's pointless to try and discuss anything re Central Bank operation with you , jem. Your knowledge of modern central bank operations is practically zero. And I will not allow myself to be sucked into a jem black hole.

If you are interested in learning. I know your not. Other than studying banking and finance at a good university, I could recommend some texts to you that you could read on your own. Just ask.

 

[TJustice]

1. Are you familiar with the word updates? Do you understand why I typed that word?

2. When you create 9 trillion US dollars on your own authority don't you own the right to create money? Privately?
Your response does not require you to go anywhere but facts and truth.
Do you have the intellectual capacity to accept examine the truth.


Answer this in your own mind.
You know the bloomberg suit uncovered the fact the FED created 9 trillion dollars and lent it out to institutions all over the world. And they did they without getting anyone's permission.

9 trillion dollars is about 3 times more than our GDP.
How do you create 9 trillion dollars if you do not own the right to create readily liquefiable accounts? (Digital US Dollars)

We are talking about the ownership of the right to create trillions of dollars.
You are responding like a grade schooler sticking his finger in his ears.

3. Go on prove to us the Fed Reserve system is not privately owned by the shareholders of the Regional Federal Reserve banks. Even though the Fed website tell us that very fact.

Let us not. That all changed in the early 1930s

The employees of the Fed system do that nightly, both directions. in and out of reserve accounts, with a key stroke. Does this scare you? It's pointless to try and discuss anything re Central Bank operation with you , jem. Your knowledge of modern central bank operations is practically zero. And I will not allow myself to be sucked into a jem black hole.

If you are interested in learning. I know your not. Other than studying banking and finance at a good university, I could recommend some texts to you that you could read on your own. Just ask.

 

[piezoe]

1. Are you familiar with the word updates? Do you understand why I typed that word?

2. When you create 9 trillion US dollars on your own authority don't you own the right to create money? Privately?
Your response does not require you to go anywhere but facts and truth.
Do you have the intellectual capacity to accept examine the truth.


Answer this in your own mind.
You know the bloomberg suit uncovered the fact the FED created 9 trillion dollars and lent it out to institutions all over the world. And they did they without getting anyone's permission.

9 trillion dollars is about 3 times more than our GDP.
How do you create 9 trillion dollars if you do not own the right to create readily liquefiable accounts? (Digital US Dollars)

We are talking about the ownership of the right to create trillions of dollars.
You are responding like a grade schooler sticking his finger in his ears.

3. Go on prove to us the Fed Reserve system is not privately owned by the shareholders of the Regional Federal Reserve banks. Even though the Fed website tell us that very fact.

whoossse suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck. iiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

 

[Tsing Tao]

Sweden crime incidents. Nothing trending poorly here at all. No big deal. Only two rapes per year or something.

And this is only through 2016.

 

[TJustice]

The quote below is what happens when a FED apologist has no useful response to explain how he can claim the FED is owned or controlled by the govt yet The Fed created 9 trillion dollars with a few key strokes and did no seek Congressional approval.

Think about that. a bank created 9 trillion dollars with key strokes.

It did not borrow the money. The money did not already exist. Congress did not give it the money. Congress did not approve of the creation of the money. Congress barely approved a 700 billion dollar bailout.

The Fed created the 9 trillion of its own accord with a key stroke.
Now who owns that ability? Its privately owned.

whoossse suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck suck. iiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

 

[piezoe]

The quote below is what happens when a FED apologist has no useful response to explain how he can claim the FED is owned or controlled by the govt yet The Fed created 9 trillion dollars with a few key strokes and did no seek Congressional approval.

Think about that. a bank created 9 trillion dollars with key strokes.

It did not borrow the money. The money did not already exist. Congress did not give it the money. Congress did not approve of the creation of the money. Congress barely approved a 700 billion dollar bailout.

The Fed created the 9 trillion of its own accord with a key stroke.
Now who owns that ability? Its privately owned.

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewhoooooooooooooooossssssssssssssh

[N.B. for those who are wondering what's going on here. This is the sound that emanates from deep inside a jem black hole as a person is sucked deeper and deeper into it. The initial Whoooosssse (see post #56) is like that of a very loud speed queen vacuum cleaner revving up. The final whooooooooooooosssssssssssssssssssh is like that of a very distant whoopee cushion being sat on. The only known, certain defense against a jem black hole is to never reply to a jem black hole post. This posts are actually lures intended to attract the unwary. They may be difficult to spot and seem innocent enough because they disguise themselves by appearing under different names, but always there is one clue, a statement that is completely off the wall bonkers.

 

[TJustice]

Below is the sound of a self nominated intellectual holding his ears like a 5 year old and saying I can't hear you in jibberish when he has no ability to counter the fact the Fed created 9 trillion dollars on it own because it owns and controls the right to create US dollars.


Again it created 9 trillon dollars and distributed it as it saw fit.

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewhoooooooooooooooossssssssssssssh

[N.B. for those who are wondering what's going on here. This is the sound that emanates from deep inside a jem black hole as a person is sucked into it. The initial Whoooosssse (see post #56) is like that of a very loud speed queen vacuum cleaner revving up. The final whooooooooooooosssssssssssssssssssh is like that of a very distant whoopee cushion being sat on. ]