All judgements are relative. To someone living in New Orleans or on Chicago's South side, Sweden has zero crime. But to a Swede used to no crime at all, the country is falling apart.Sweden Election: Populists Set for Major Gains, Social Democrats’ Grip on Power Fading
386
8 Sep 2018649
Sweden is set to see a major political shift after national elections on Sunday, as the populist Sweden Democrats have a chance to become the largest party in the country.
Sweden goes to the polls on Sunday to elect a new government, and the ruling Social Democrats, who have been the most dominant party in the country for decades, could not only lose power but, according to polls, possibly even lose their status as the largest party in the country.
A number of issues have dominated the debate leading up to the election, including rising levels of violent crime and the impact of mass migration, which was shown to be the most important issue for Swedes according to a poll from earlier this year.
Since the last election in 2014, Sweden has seen a rise in the number of radical Islamic extremists, with the country seeing its first radical Islamic terror attack in Stockholm in 2017.
The growth of heavily migrant-populated “vulnerable suburbs,” commonly referred to as no-go zones due to difficulties emergency services often face operating in them, has also become a major issue in Sweden along, with a rise in gun violence and grenade attackslinked to organised criminal gangs.
There are three main alliances or parties currently vying for power in the election, each with different platforms and, in some cases, with a number of scandals that have occurred on the campaign trail.
Sweden Democrats
The eurosceptic, anti-mass migration Sweden Democrats (SD), led by Jimmie Åkesson, have seen a meteoric rise in the polls since the last national election in 2014, where they received 12.9 percent of the vote.
Much of the support for the party has come following the 2015 migrant crisis, with many voters favouring its tough stance on mass migration. In a party leaders’ debate earlier this year, Mr Åkesson dominated his rivals on immigration and law and order issues, leading to viewers declaring him the victor in a post-debate poll.
The SD have also put forward policies to crack down on organised crime, including proposing that the Swedish army should support the police in no-go zones where they, and other emergency services, have come under attack from residents.
Breitbart London@BreitbartLondon
Sweden Democrats Promise to Reduce Asylum Numbers to Zero and End Chain Migration http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/18/populist-sweden-democrats-promise-reduce-asylum-numbers-zero-election-platform/ …
11:12 AM - Feb 18, 2018
Sweden Democrats Promise to Reduce Asylum Numbers to Zero and End Chain Migration
The Sweden Democrats (SD) have promised to reduce both asylum claims and chain migration -- or 'family reunification' -- to zero, and pledged to turn the migration board into a "remigration" board.
breitbart.com
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The party’s tough positions have also earned them the ire of Islamists, far-left extremists, and even members of the media, with SD leader Jimmie Åkesson being personally targetted last year when his home was attacked.
TV4 sports journalist Christoffer Eriksson victim-blamed Åkesson after the attack, saying: “For you see, Jimmie is a Nazi. He, Kent, Linus, Andrew and others, they are Nazis. And the Nazis have no place in rooms with us,” he declared.
Åkesson has also been threatened by radical Islamists as recently as this week, when alleged Islamic State sources made threats to kill him and his four-year-old son if he did not step down from campaigning.
Most polls show the SD in second place behind the ruling Social Democrats, despite big gains, but some show the party in first, fueling speculation that the SD could upset the political establishment.
However, even if the populists came in first, it is unlikely the establishment parties would form a coalition with them, having declared a cordon sanitaire around them — for now.
Social Democrats
The ruling Social Democrats, who have dominated Swedish politics since before the Second World War, are now looking at the very real possibility of their worst election result in history, according to polling data.
The leftist party rules the country alongside its partners in the Green Party in the so-called red-green coalition, and are still the main contenders to govern the country alongside their main rivals, the centre-right Alliance.
Led by current Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, the Social Democrats have overseen the mass movement of asylum seekers into the country since 2015, which has led to a surge in new problems for the country including child marriages, a rise in ‘honour crime’ issues, and the growth of radical Islamic extremism.
Breitbart London@BreitbartLondon
‘Like a Military Operation’: 100 Cars Burnt in Swedish ‘No-Go Zones’ https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/08/14/military-operation-masked-gangs-set-100-cars-ablaze-across-swedish-no-go-zones/ …
10:00 AM - Aug 14, 2018
‘Like a Military Operation’: 100 Cars Burnt in Swedish 'No-Go Zones'
A gang of masked “youths” rampaged through Sweden’s second-largest city Monday night, setting cars ablaze in an attack described as “extremely organised” and like a military operation by the Prime...
breitbart.com
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Violence and car burnings in no-go zones have also grown under the leadership of Löfven, with 100 cars being damaged by arsonists in a single night in Gothenburg last month.
Violence toward police has also grown, including the bombing of a police station in Helsingborg which he admitted was an “attack against our democracy.”
Despite these growing issues, Löfven denied the existence of no-go zones while on an official visit to the United States, to the dismay of Sweden Democrats leader Åkesson, who told Breitbart London: “The police themselves have confirmed the existence of no-go zones for the entire world to see. The statements of the Prime Minister is nothing short of a classic example of fake news.”
The Social Democrats have also seen scandal during the campaign, including a member who spread lies about the Sweden Democrats and the Moderate Party in Arabic on social media, claiming both parties wanted to ban all halal meat, close mosques, ban the Islamic veil for anyone under 18, close all Islamic schools, and try and accuse Muslims of crimes in order to take away their children.
The Alliance
The centre-right “Alliance” consists of the Moderate Party, the Christian Democrats, the Liberals, and the Centre Party, who have steadily adopted many of the talking points of the Sweden Democrats to present a real challenge to the ruling red-green coalition.
The Moderate Party, led by Ulf Kristersson, has adopted a much tougher stance on migration and integration issues following the rise of the Sweden Democrats in the polls, including calling for legislation to arrest Islamic “morality police” operating in no-go zones in migrant-populated suburbs.
Breitbart London@BreitbartLondon
Swedish Moderate Party Calls for Arrests of ‘Morality Police’ in No-Go Zones http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/24/swedish-moderate-party-calls-arrests-morality-police-in-no-go-zones/ …
6:36 AM - May 24, 2018
Moderate Party Calls for Arrests of 'Morality Police' In No-Go Zones
A Swedish party has called for a new law to criminalise anyone in the migrant-populated no-go zones from acting as "morality police".
breitbart.com
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Members of the Moderates have also supported the Sweden Democrats’ idea of allowing the military to operate in no-go zones to aid police. The Moderates’ coalition partner, the Christian Democrats, have also talked tough on integration issues, with leader Ebba Busch-Thor calling for the banning of the public broadcast of the Islamic call to prayer.
An average of recent polls shows that even with the support of the Greens, the Social Democrats would only have 29.4 percent of the vote, compared to the Alliance with 37.6 percent — but in either case neither would be able to form a majority coalition alone, which could afford the Sweden Democrats major influence in the legislative chamber.
View image on Twitter
Europe Elects@EuropeElects
Sweden, average of all pollsters last poll before the election (not including SCB):
S-S&D: 24.4% (-6.6)
SD-EFDD: 19.2% (+6.5)
M-EPP: 17.6% (-5.7)
V-LEFT: 10% (+4.3)
C-ALDE: 8.1% (+2)
L-ALDE: 6% (+0.6)
KD-EPP: 5.9% (+1.3)
MP-G/EFA: 5% (-1.9)
+/- vs. #val2014
7:40 AM - Sep 8, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The election is scheduled to take place on Sunday with polls closing at 8 p.m. local time.
Sweden's awesome liberal and socialist eutopia coming to an end.
- Thread starter Optionpro007
- Start date
Please. You know absolutely nothing about what is going on in Sweden.
I try and respect the opinions of every one. Sometimes it is just impossible. This post of yours above, to put it a little too mildly, is ridiculous. And believe me when I say I am no supporter of the ACA as passed. Single payer would have been vastly better. But at least the ACA was a tiny step away from the brink. Your comments regarding the speed of recovery from recession and Medicare Part D are absurd. (Medicare PartD is totally fucked up, but you have not addressed why.)
In addition, you've suggested that I maintained that deficits don't matter. This is incorrect. What I have pointed out is that, according to MMT economists whom I largely agree with, small deficits can be carried virtually forever. There are constraints of course. So a blanket statement such as you have incorrectly imputed to me, and such as i believe Dick Cheney was to have uttered during national consternation over Iraq war costs, is nonsense. Deficits must be maintained in line with slow, steady growth in the money supply* as required by growth in population and productivity. When too much money is introduced too rapidly into an economy, inflation is the usual result. This can be ameliorated to some extent, and the problems it would have otherwise created deferred to future administrations, by concentrating the extra money near the top of the income distribution. This keeps much of the new money out of circulation as it reappears in the form of treasuries purchased by those with disposable income far exceeding their immediate needs. Supply-side economics has become the usual mechanism for carrying out this subterfuge.
___________________
*Deficits are the mechanism governments use to increase the money supply in the economy, i.e., they spend it into the economy. An increase in savings and investment are one of the consequences. Inflation can be another. Still another consequence is an increase in government revenues. However supply-side economics introduced via tax cuts has not increased revenues enough to cancel the deficit created. If that were to happen there would be no net deficit and no net growth of the money supply, and no additional inflation. The government must produce a net deficit to produce a net increase in the money supply. The closest we came to producing a neutral effect from tax cuts, i.e., revenue increases approximately canceled out deficits, occurred during the demand-side economic stimulus applied during the Kennedy Administration. If a government runs consistent surpluses the economy will eventually be thrown into recession as deflation sets in and real interest rates rise. The government spends money into the economy and takes it back out via taxes and fees. The best it can do, ceteris paribis, is to balance these two flows. When population/productivity is growing the government must run appropriate small deficits to avoid throwing the economy into recession. Needless to say, the economy of a nation with its own fiat currency is not comparable to one's household economy and must be managed very differently.
Last edited:
Of course. Who would know that better than you!
They may get quite a surprise.Soon we will have Swedes moving to Chicago to escape the crime in their home country.
I don't know if I agree with your analysis because I haven't thought about it much, but what you say makes sense. It's nice to read a coherent argument here every once in a while . So thank you.
I live in a state with very low property taxes, a couple hundred thousand or so who have virtually no access to medical care except through emergency rooms --medicaid was not expanded -- the worst public schools in the nation according to standard measures, and a regressive and criminal, criminal justice system. My state is a big taker per capita of Federal dollars. So I suppose My state helps to make your case.
Last edited:
Soon we will have Swedes moving to Chicago to escape the crime in their home country.
I am in favor of giving the women immediate refugee status. We really have no use for the men who refuse to protect their women however.
Thank you for quoting me. Obviously I've had quite am impact on your thinking, and I am flattered. Maybe we can work together to reduce American hypocrisy. I know the two of us working together, arm in arm, side by side, shoulder to shoulder, will never be able to totally eliminate American hypocrisy, but let's try to reduce it to just every now and then.Says the forum "expert" on coherence
