Supreme court upholds voter ID law, disenfranchising native Americans in ND

"There is no substantiated evidence that election fraud is a serious issue in the US. It's a bogey man to rile your side up..."
There's no substantiated evidence of Russian collusion either, but that doesn't stop your side from looking for it, and indeed fabricating evidence to justify the continuing search.
You either take the sanctity of the electoral process seriously or you don't. One cannot claim to be outraged at the possibility of foreign players influencing our electoral process, and then blow off the very real threat of non citizens showing up to cast their vote as if that presents no problem.
Not to worry though, your rogue states like California and Illinois are issuing valid drivers licences to illegals, which will then be used as a legit ID to vote. Understandable strategy seeing that so many blacks are fleeing the dem plantation. Got to replace them with someone.

There is substantial evidence that Russia interfered in our election. What hasn't been shown yet is that Trump was personally involved. Even trump has acknowledged it.
 
There is substantial evidence that Russia interfered in our election. What hasn't been shown yet is that Trump was personally involved. Even trump has acknowledged it.
Interference and collusion are two different things. I know the leftist media loves to conflate the two, but they are worlds apart. Further, Russians, Chinese and any number of other countries have been "interfering" for decades, as have we.
The only actual evidence of collusion is among the democratic party, the FBI, the Justice Department, the Obama administration, and of course our friends in the media.
 
By the way if you are for free speech and the market place of ideas you should not be worried about russians troll on social media. If you are worried about foreigners on social media advocating for politicians and parties without registering you would have to arrest 80 to 90 percent of the lefties on this board.
 
I think you just violated your own principle when you said it was okay for some citizens to lose their right to vote because they don't have an address in return for the security of potentially eliminating a small amount of electoral fraud.

Not at all. Show me where, in the Constitution, it says people who cannot prove they are a legal citizen have a right to vote.

Is there actual evidence that electoral fraud is rampant? I have seen several studies that show it's a small percentage; but to use that logic, most gun owners are responsible - but a few have decided to shoot up schools and as a result millions of children are inconvenienced with active shooter drills. So guns should be banned.

I've posted the evidence that electoral fraud happens. If you choose to ignore it, I can't do much about that.

Regarding people shooting up schools, there are a multitude of laws already in place to prevent that. Why isn't there a law in place requiring ID?

Why have you continued to ignore my questions on the comparison between having ID to vote, and having ID to do many other things? Why is one taking rights away and all the other things not?
vote-jpg.193024
 
Those are just the examples we know of. It's quite likely the true nature of the problem is much, much larger and - here's the kicker - getting worse every election.

Still haven't answered why ID shouldn't be needed for voting, but should be needed for the list of things I listed above.

So you provide no proof that voter id is rampant and extrapolate some insignificant figures to make your case? By that logic, some gun owners are nuts, so the problem must be pervasive among gun owners.

An ID shouldn't be needed for voting for the same reason I can tell ND to fuck off. See, I don't need an ID to exercise my 1st. Nor should I need an ID to exercise my 15th and telling them to fuck off w/my vote.
 
So you provide no proof that voter id is rampant and extrapolate some insignificant figures to make your case? By that logic, some gun owners are nuts, so the problem must be pervasive among gun owners.

An ID shouldn't be needed for voting for the same reason I can tell ND to fuck off. See, I don't need an ID to exercise my 1st. Nor should I need an ID to exercise my 15th and telling them to fuck off w/my vote.

the15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution declared, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”

Not applicable to this discussion.
 
Not at all. Show me where, in the Constitution, it says people who cannot prove they are a legal citizen have a right to vote.



I've posted the evidence that electoral fraud happens. If you choose to ignore it, I can't do much about that.

Regarding people shooting up schools, there are a multitude of laws already in place to prevent that. Why isn't there a law in place requiring ID?

Why have you continued to ignore my questions on the comparison between having ID to vote, and having ID to do many other things? Why is one taking rights away and all the other things not?
vote-jpg.193024

He ignores your questions because there is no legitimate argument against voter ID. If people really care about citizens without valid IDs, then they should focus their efforts on helping them get valid IDs. Many states offer free IDs to low income citizens. All states should. The same is true regarding ND tribal addresses. The address requirement should have been rectified after the law was passed.
 
So you provide no proof that voter id is rampant and extrapolate some insignificant figures to make your case? By that logic, some gun owners are nuts, so the problem must be pervasive among gun owners.

An ID shouldn't be needed for voting for the same reason I can tell ND to stop it. See, I don't need an ID to exercise my 1st. Nor should I need an ID to exercise my 15th and telling them to disregard my vote.
Common sense would dictate that ID is not extraordinary.
 
Back
Top