Supreme court ducks the issue

ART:"There is no proof that "they did not want to deal with it."*
AXE: I never said there was. (Your fabricated strawman)
ART:Of course you never said there was, because there is not.
ART:Unfounded opinion...see the pattern?
AXE:What!??! You assert a strawman, I call you on it, and then
you reply with unfounded opinion???? Yup...you're CLUELESS.


BWAAA HAAA HAAAAAAAAA! Get off the crack dude. You sound more like an idiot every post. :D



You made an unsupported claim, I called you on it. I asked for proof of your claim, you provided none. You couldn't even make a coherent argument to support your claim.

YOU committed A STRAWMAN YOU IDIOT!!
You didn't call me on SHIT. geeeez..img arguing with a mental midget!



ART: You verified nothing.
Continue to reject reality. You were caught red handed in
your 5th STRAWMAN. Get over it. You cant reason. That is clear.


I stated fact, that you made a claim without proof.
More delusions. An unsupported claim.



One article's headline was already revised, and the other articles are missing.
The quote from the atheist cult member has zero validity due to bias.
The five sources you claim are missing.


MORON!!! The reference to the cnn article is what started this thread.
***I DID NOT USE THE CNN ARTICLE AS ONE OF MY QUOTES***
when making my point, along with the other 4.
Which apparently, you are soooo fucking stupid, you cant even
look them up yourself.

ART..... now your just being a lying sack of shit.
You were destroyed in yet another stupid argument and
have to rely on your deep delusions to continue.

THERE IS NO POINT IN arguing with someone who so blatantly
LIES and rejects reality as you do.
How many times are you going to claim I didn't post 4 newspaper
sources when I CLEARLY did and they are forever captured
in this thread???? Are you brain dead??? I guess so!

You have deep seated delusions and should seek medical attention.

What is the point of arguing with someone, who closes his eyes,
and sticks his head in the sand when you provide DIRECT
QUOTES from newspaper websites?

This proves beyond ANY DOUBT, that you yourself KNOW you
just got destroyed and have to pretend you're a completely
dumb fucking moron, even more stupid than longshot in
a pathetic attempt to defend yourself.

Thank you for verifying that either your lost, or simply have
an IQ TOO LOW to page up and read the 4 newspaper quotes
I posted.

Truly a bonda fide basket case. :p

Now off you go to listen to the little god voices in your head
and to let longshot finish the job he working on in your crotch!

Lmaoooooooooo :p

Bye bye 777, it was fun making you look like the totally
delusional lying sack of shit fool you are...AGAIN.

ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.

This was exceptionally stupid and pathetic, even for YOU ART/777 :p

Can you say DELUUUUSIONAAAAL? LMAOOO :p


Now show some integrity and LEAVE the site which you
were BANNED from. You spineless idiot.


peace

axeman
 
"Its clear they ducked the main issue, its not even arguable."

Unsupported claim. Baseless opinion.

"But its obvious the court really doesn't want to have to deal with it."

Unsupported claim. Baseless opinion.

"..the supreme court wiggled their way out
of answering the question.."

Unsupported claim. Baseless opinion.

What happens when you challenge someone on their opinion, ask for proof of their conclusions and they refuse to respond in an adult manner?

Just read this thread, and you can see how one person lacking adult communication skills handles it.

What do you think of someone who farts their opinions but won't back them up with a reasonable response when questioned?

Just another sphincter would be a reasonable thought....
 
What an idiot....its as if everything I have posted so far
MAGICALLY disappeared.

Forget this part already art???

ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.


Thats right ART/777 keep sticking your head in the sand.
I already proved beyond any doubt using 4 quotes that
multiple newspaper media sources ALSO said dodged/sidestepped.

What happens when you challenge someone on their opinion, ask for proof of their conclusions and they refuse to respond in an adult manner?

Just read this thread, and you can see how ART is lacking
in the intellectual and communication skills to handle it.

What do you think of someone who farts their opinions,
asks for proof, and when it is provided, stuffs his head
in the sand, and rejects reality claiming the proof was never posted? :D



Checkmate again.

You may now go back to your regularly scheduled delusions. :p


peace

axeman


Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

"Its clear they ducked the main issue, its not even arguable."

Unsupported claim. Baseless opinion.

"But its obvious the court really doesn't want to have to deal with it."

Unsupported claim. Baseless opinion.

"..the supreme court wiggled their way out
of answering the question.."

Unsupported claim. Baseless opinion.

What happens when you challenge someone on their opinion, ask for proof of their conclusions and they refuse to respond in an adult manner?

Just read this thread, and you can see how one person lacking adult communication skills handles it.

What do you think of someone who farts their opinions but won't back them up with a reasonable response when questioned?

Just another sphincter would be a reasonable thought....
More...
 
Now, that's a dodge, a sidestep, and a wiggle.

Question asked from the very first page of this thread by Intoodeep:

Intoodeep
Junior Member

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 6


06-15-04 09:14 AM

It is clear?

Where is your proof?

Waiting on the proof of claims, but all we get is dodge, sidestep, and wiggle.

How difficult is it to stay on point, and respond to the question?

Where is your proof of the initial claims?

Please tell us you have more than a couple of newspaper's who voice their opinion.

Fact based reports excluded "dodge" sidestep" and "wiggle."




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from axeman:

Its clear they ducked the main issue, its not even arguable.

Guess we will have to wait for someone else with a stronger
legal standing to push the issue.
But its obvious the court really doesn't want to have to deal with it.
I wonder why


peace

axeman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quote from axeman:

What an idiot....its as if everything I have posted so far
MAGICALLY disappeared.

Forget this part already art???

ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.
ART: You didn't post 4 newspaper articles!
AXE: Ummm page up dumb ass.


Thats right ART/777 keep sticking your head in the sand.
I already proved beyond any doubt using 4 quotes that
multiple newspaper media sources ALSO said dodged/sidestepped.

What happens when you challenge someone on their opinion, ask for proof of their conclusions and they refuse to respond in an adult manner?

Just read this thread, and you can see how ART is lacking
in the intellectual and communication skills to handle it.

What do you think of someone who farts their opinions,
asks for proof, and when it is provided, stuffs his head
in the sand, and rejects reality claiming the proof was never posted? :D



Checkmate again.

You may now go back to your regularly scheduled delusions. :p


peace

axeman
More...
 
More nonsense from a delusional idiot.

We already went over this.

The ROOT of the matter comes down to the MEANING
of the word dodge/sidestepped in this context.

YOU INCORRECTLY ASSUMED it has a nefarious meaning.
I posted 4 newspaper articles as objective examples
which showed that it could easily simply mean that the core
issue of church/state separation was not addressed.

Once pinned in a corner, you resort to REJECTING REALITY
and claiming that I NEVER POSTED the 4 articles.


There is NO POINT in arguing with a complete idiot who
continues to blatantly REJECT reality like you do.

So buzz off ART. You are TOO delusional to argue with.
There is no point.

You run around screaming like a little kid:

No you didnt post those 4 newspaper articles!
You didnt! You didnt! Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa booo hoooo!
You didnt! You didnt!!!


Go cry to mommy.... you dont have the required IQ to debate.


ART: You didnt post the 4 news quotes
AXE: Yes I did.
ART: No you didnt
AXE: Page up and READ them
ART: No you didnt WHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! BOO HOOO!!


No point in going in circles. You clearly reject reality.
You lose again :p

Go argue with longshot. He is on your level of reasoning. (AKA: NONE)

peace

axeman
 
You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?

That is your offer of proof of your claims? That is the very best you can do to defend your position? This is what you rest your case on and claim victory?

Here is exactly what you did:

Dodge, wiggle, sidestep...

Quote from axeman:

More nonsense from a delusional idiot.

We already went over this.

The ROOT of the matter comes down to the MEANING
of the word dodge/sidestepped in this context.

YOU INCORRECTLY ASSUMED it has a nefarious meaning.
I posted 4 newspaper articles as objective examples
which showed that it could easily simply mean that the core
issue of church/state separation was not addressed.

Once pinned in a corner, you resort to REJECTING REALITY
and claiming that I NEVER POSTED the 4 articles.


There is NO POINT in arguing with a complete idiot who
continues to blatantly REJECT reality like you do.

So buzz off ART. You are TOO delusional to argue with.
There is no point.

You run around screaming like a little kid:

No you didnt post those 4 newspaper articles!
You didnt! You didnt! Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa booo hoooo!
You didnt! You didnt!!!


Go cry to mommy.... you dont have the required IQ to debate.


ART: You didnt post the 4 news quotes
AXE: Yes I did.
ART: No you didnt
AXE: Page up and READ them
ART: No you didnt WHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! BOO HOOO!!


No point in going in circles. You clearly reject reality.
You lose again :p

Go argue with longshot. He is on your level of reasoning. (AKA: NONE)

peace

axeman
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?

That is your offer of proof of your claims? That is the very best you can do to defend your position? This is what you rest your case on and claim victory?

Here is exactly what you did:

Dodge, wiggle, sidestep...
More...

this is why i call Axe SPEEDIN BULLSHIT

:D :D :D
 
Baseless drivel.

Please provide written evidence from the 5 newspaper authors
that all 5 headlines were pulled because they were faulty.

Or are you claiming magical mind reading powers again???

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :p



Wait a second ART..... why aren't you claiming that I never
posted the 4 newspapers now?

Are you ADMITTING that I DID post them now?


Watch ART doing the backstroke now.

You just admitted you were wrong. Good job.

ART: You didn't post the 4 newspaper headlines!!!
ART: You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?
ART: You didn't post the 4 newspaper headlines!!!
ART: You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?
ART: You didn't post the 4 newspaper headlines!!!
ART: You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?


What a schizophrenic delusional psych patient :p
Back and forth...from delusions to reality.
A bipolar psychotic mess of an idiot :p LMAOOOOOOOO :p

Bye bye ART..... nothing but post after post of blatant lies,
fallacies, a reality rejection. You have been decimated. AGAIN :D
Its ok...we know it hurts...you can discuss this with your
psychologist after they take you away from your internet play room
and put you back in the little white room tonight.

ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :p

peace

axeman



Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?

That is your offer of proof? That is the very best you can do to defend your position?

Here is exactly what you did:

Dodge, wiggle, sidestep...
More...
 
Good to see you came up for AIR from 777s crotch longshot :p
I thought you were going to pass out with cock in your mouth!

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :p

Buzz off poser...this is a TRADING board. We all know you BLEW OUT
and have resorted to drinking....BWAAAA HAAA HAAAAAAA :p
Pathetic poser! :D

Back to 777s crotch you go! LMAOOOO :p

peace

axeman



Quote from LongShot:

this is why i call Axe SPEEDIN BULLSHIT

:D :D :D
More...
 
Dodge, wiggle, sidestep the issue of his claims, brought to you by axeman.

No wonder he tries so desperately to defend the terms.....

Quote from axeman:

Baseless drivel.

Please provide written evidence from the 5 newspaper authors
that all 5 headlines were pulled because they were faulty.

Or are you claiming magical mind reading powers again???

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :p



Wait a second ART..... why aren't you claiming that I never
posted the 4 newspapers now?

Are you ADMITTING that I DID post them now?


Watch ART doing the backstroke now.

You just admitted you were wrong. Good job.

ART: You didn't post the 4 newspaper headlines!!!
ART: You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?
ART: You didn't post the 4 newspaper headlines!!!
ART: You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?
ART: You didn't post the 4 newspaper headlines!!!
ART: You posted 4 newspapers, headed by CNN which pulled the inital article and headline because of a faulty headline?


What a schizophrenic delusional psych patient :p
Back and forth...from delusions to reality.
A bipolar psychotic mess of an idiot :p LMAOOOOOOOO :p

Bye bye ART..... nothing but post after post of blatant lies,
fallacies, a reality rejection. You have been decimated. AGAIN :D
Its ok...we know it hurts...you can discuss this with your
psychologist after they take you away from your internet play room
and put you back in the little white room tonight.

ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :p

peace

axeman
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top