Excluding triangles. Prove me wrong.
What you believe to be true, is true for you.
Excluding triangles. Prove me wrong.
ET lol
Channels are typically ABC, WXY single or double corrections. The news will align with the wave or visa versa like a self fulfilling prophecy, so basically you can just ignore external factors. You could almost predict the news from the fed wouldn't be good because the wave needed to fulfil this extension. ...I mean I didn't even bother looking for resistance lines because they are meaning less.
I see all these proprietary trading firms bragging on YT about their traders but I am not convinced because from what I see they are basically just trying to scalp the vwap...or play break outs or break downs. This is a very reactionary, and rudimentary form of trading.
Without knowing the wave count you are not seeing the big picture. It was clear (statistically) that xsp was going to blow through all previous support zones on its 3rd wave extension.
View attachment 323841
Anyway, charting is one thing, but its no holy grail, especially when it comes to options trading. This place is home to some of the most knowledgeable options traders around. You know who you areWith options you can be totally right directionally and still lose money so it is an entirely different animal.
LMFAO HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHET lol






LMFAO HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
I ALWAYS laugh so hard when you respond with "ET lol"
LMFAO HAHAHAHAHAHHA![]()

The effect in search of a why.As with all natural phenomenon, the "effect" is observed first, then a "cause" is attributed to it. News falls in the searching for a "cause" bucket.
Excluding triangles. Prove me wrong.
.Anyway, charting is one thing, but its no holy grail, especially when it comes to options trading. This place is home to some of the most knowledgeable options traders around. You know who you areWith options you can be totally right directionally and still lose money so it is an entirely different animal.

In a longish downtrend, MA's will work against you, they only sort of work in longish uptrends..
wxy, glad you added this 2nd post to clarify & show the first one wasn't just a hit-and-run.
My experience with moving averages is opposite yours... I improved my success rate when I began using two-colored medium-term (~ 40 - 70 period) moving averages, primarily EMAs. Their slopes determine the direction of the trades; they don't provide actual buy and sell signals, rather they simply make it more likely that my real buy and sell signals get me into the market in the direction of the current trend. Lots of backtesting and real world trading data have convinced me of their usefulness.
In the charts below, my systems only permit buying when the MA is blue and only selling when the MA is red.
View attachment 323846
Translation:
I am not prepared to invest any time or effort into studying and testing.
I want people to present me with the work that they have invested their time and energy into.
In order to goad someone into presenting this information to me,I will issue the request as a challenge.
Reminds me of another poster on here from way back,he was the exception to the rule though,probably trading 100 ES contracts per click from some palace in Barbados by now...