Its funny because if I plot those on my chart, neither the 200 SMA nor the 50% level match up.Daily 50% retrace bounce from March low to July high...also despite Mickey's skepticism, the 200 SMA
Its funny because if I plot those on my chart, neither the 200 SMA nor the 50% level match up.Daily 50% retrace bounce from March low to July high...also despite Mickey's skepticism, the 200 SMA
Thanks for showing me, that I should at least consider using some EMAs. I always believed EMAs to be a noob myth that do seldomly work. Thank you.MA's are tools, some make use of them and some don't. I use them as geographical reference points and dynamic S/R. When my 20ema is flat, I am flat (unless it's a zone entry off a measurable leg)...some will scalp ranges, I don't.
View attachment 323900
Thanks for showing me, that I should at least consider using some EMAs. I always believed EMAs to be a noob myth that do seldomly work. Thank you.
We are all different and will all trade differently. It is up to each of us to discover what gives us a recognizable defined edge. Take anything you read with a healthy dose of skepticism (especially on ET). Always study and test any concept or tool before you try and use it.Thanks for showing me, that I should at least consider using some EMAs. I always believed EMAs to be a noob myth that do seldomly work. Thank you.
It seems to me here that if the red line is the 200 SMA, it didn't hold as it broke hard on the last bar in the chart.
The 50% didn't hold as well. Of course you can have your own rules about how far to let it go against a position, or maybe there was even no entry yet, but I wouldn't exactly say the EMA and 50% levels held.
The 50% didn't hold as well. Of course you can have your own rules about how far to let it go against a position, or maybe there was even no entry yet, but I wouldn't exactly say the EMA and 50% levels held.