Quote from bhardy307:
"Are you sure about that? Did you test it? I did and found that trading with a long term trend on a shorter time basis gives one about a .11 edge on the profit factor and 1.45% to .2% edge on the win ratio. Going against the trend cost one about an equal amount. I don't trade with the trend and one needs to determine if one even has a trend to know if this applies."
I am guessing you did this test on past data. Therefore, by your own arguments, we must conclude that this is no more predictive than the MACD. From what I can see, every working strategy only works for a while, and then it fails. The movement of a stock is nothing more than then an aggregated representation of 30 % personal opinion and speculation, and 70% the result of some sophisticated quant analysis given by the 70% of trades that are now completed through algorithmic trading.
My point quite simply is, can we ever come up with an approach that is consistent? Clearly, your study shows that on that particular group of data, if you had got into the market at that time, you would have produced positive results, but will you in the future.
Quote from ElecEquity:
I'm not 100% sure if this is contrast to what you're saying or not...but in any given trade I believe there's a certain amount of luck involved...but over a long period of success I would say that luck isn't an element of the equation. However, I do think I would've been lucky to trade during the golden age of trading. I'd love for those markets to return...probably will have to wait at least another 40 years for real irrational exuberance. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Quote from Spiker:
Quote from ElecEquity:
Bhardy....I've read and reread most of the stuff that this guy Lucias is saying & the fact is that it's a bunch of jibberish.
Lol......do him a real favour and give him the mentors name.
Someone i know?
Thanks ElecEquity and others. Jibberish? For now, I'll listen to everyone's opinion.
Quote from kingfisher3210:
Hint 1- You need atleast 2500-3000 hours of practice to develop a neural circuit in your brain to start trading.
Hint 2: You are following MACD. Another trader is using SMA. Another one is using Fib.
There are millions of individual traders using millions of different trading system and methods.
But what everyone do 'collectively gets reflected on price'. Think about it-Add all actions of traders and that gets reflected in price.
Trading is 100% mass/crowd psychology. To become a master trader, put 3000 hours in understanding crowd psychology by seeing previous patterns.
Quote from bhardy307:
Thanks kingfisher. I recognize this.
"The movement of a stock is nothing more than then an aggregated representation of 30 % personal opinion and speculation, and 70% the result of some sophisticated quant analysis given by the 70% of trades that are now completed through algorithmic trading." - Me
"Think about it-Add all actions of traders and that gets reflected in price." - You.
We're essentially saying the same thing.
"Hint 2: You are following MACD. Another trader is using SMA. Another one is using Fib."
What are the most popular methods of technical analysis?
Quote from Lucias:
Real irrational exuberance? How much is the S&P 500 up over the last 2 years? How much was it down the previous year?
Bull markets are only easy to trade in hindsight..
just gibberish.