Strzok's karma is making a return visit to bite him in the arse.

[TreeFrogTrader]

You gotta laugh and shake your head when you hear Strzok's attorney saying they have not decided yet whether "Pete" will show up to testify next week even though he has been served a subpoena.

The attorney rants on with faux outrage about how his client is the victim of a politically biased investigation and that Congress is just trying to draw him into a perjury trap.

Heh, well, that's a sad story right there Pete. Meanwhile, you have a double duty to apper. One, because you have been subpoenaed. Two, because you are a DOJ employee and the oversight committee wants to speak with you.

Havin fun yet, Pete?

 

[Tony Stark]

Nobody gives a shit about Strzok.Cohen is where the action is at.

 

[UsualName]

Nobody gives a shit about Strzok

That’s not true, I do.

If these republicans keep shaking his tree they may not like what comes out. Same thing happened with the IG report.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

He's lucky he still has his pension and is not facing multiple felonies. That could all change in a hurry if we got a real Attorney General.

 

[UsualName]

He's lucky he still has his pension and is not facing multiple felonies. That could all change in a hurry if we got a real Attorney General.

It’s always the same thing. Like I said, watch out when messing with Mr. Strzok. This guy knows a lot.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

It’s always the same thing. Like I said, watch out when messing with Mr. Strzok. This guy knows a lot.

McCabe and Comey and Brennan and Clapper and Susan Rice are the ones who need to watch out for the fact that Strzok knows a lot.

If Pete gets a chance to be in the slam with McCabe for a couple years or to "cooperate" and be out porking Lisa Page, which one you think he is gonna take? Can you answer that White Boy?

Oh, and one other thing. Keep in mind that Lisa's text message to Pete reminded him that Obama wanted to be kept informed of everything. Let's pursue that a bit more as we go along, shall we? Lisa is also scheduled to testify, unless her lawyer tells her to take the fifth. Too late for Strzok to that the fifth. He has lost that.

 

[UsualName]

McCabe and Comey and Brennan and Clapper and Susan Rice are the ones who need to watch out for the fact that Strzok knows a lot.

If Pete gets a chance to be in the slam with McCabe for a couple years or to "cooperate" and be out porking Lisa Page, which one you think he is gonna take? Can you answer that White Boy?

Oh, and one other thing. Keep in mind that Lisa's text message to Pete reminded him that Obama wanted to be kept informed of everything. Let's pursue that a bit more as we go along, shall we? Lisa is also scheduled to testify, unless her lawyer tells her to take the fifth. Too late for Strzok to that the fifth. He has lost that.

The funny thing is you always say these guys are going to prison but they never do.

I guess if you throw a hundred darts one will eventually hit the bullseye. I’m not sure you’re that lucky though.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

The funny thing is you always say these guys are going to prison but they never do.

I guess if you throw a hundred darts one will eventually hit the bullseye. I’m not sure you’re that lucky though.

The swamp keeps putting "insurance policies" in place and texting others to tell that "we will stop it."

 

[UsualName]

The swamp keeps putting "insurance policies" in place and texting others to tell that "we will stop it."

And Trump said he fired Comey for the Russia thing, is he going to prison? Maybe that’s a bad comparison.

Whoops.

Well Trump called a Muslim ban then targeted Muslim countries for a ban. How about that comparison? Did that mean he broke the law?

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

And Trump said he fired Comey for the Russia thing, is he going to prison? Maybe that’s a bad comparison.

Whoops.

Well Trump called a Muslim ban then targeted Muslim countries for a ban. How about that comparison? Did that mean he broke the law?

Trump has a constitutional right/authority to fire any of his subordinates for any reason. He also had a letter from Rod Rosenstein stating that Comey had committed a number of violations and poor judgement.

Did Strzok have a constitutional power authorizing him to use his authority and power of his office to try to pick a winner for the election and act upon that decision? Get back to me when you can quote the constitutional authority for that.

And in regard to the "muslim ban" analogy that you cite, or whatever your kool-aid purpose is there, the Court has spoken on that.

As previously discussed, all of this is foreign to your ilk who are not familiar with the Constitution or dismiss it if you are.