Strzok's karma is making a return visit to bite him in the arse.

I don’t know what his reasoning is. The hiring suggests his investigation is growing and he expects more indictments than his staff can currently handle. Maybe he even expects a big indictment and he wants to build a team that can handle the task.

What it doesn’t suggest is that he is wrapping up.

We have already overdiscussed this over the months.

I have never said that there would not be crimes alleged and prosecuted. This is the nature of a witch hunt. When you can't deliver on the main mission, then you go off and try to make up in volume what you cannot accomplish by making the big kill.

Mueller knows that he is not going to get Trump on obstruction or collusion- so it is a given that he will try to work a pile of sidecrimes and lower level scalps. Never been a time when this was not true.

Your ilk likes to make the case that if Mueller gets some side scalps that that proves that this is not a witch hunt. Nope. The opposite. And no one in their right frigging mind thinks that you could not just through a dart into Camp Hillary and get a conviction on anyone, anywhere there. But the swamp made sure that did not happen.
 
If Trump didn’t have the protections of a sitting president, the fbi would have brought charges against him a long time ago. You know it and I know it.

Oh, the FBI has been working hard to bring Trump down- once he got the nomination so dont expect much argument from me there.
 
If Trump didn’t have the protections of a sitting president, the fbi would have brought charges against him a long time ago. You know it and I know it.

Interesting too that in the past when the question of indicting a sitting president came up, you and your ilk liked to point out that it had not been settled in court yet. Now that the time for Mueller to deliver is arriving, you start to walk sideways like a crab and say that the FBI would have brought charges long ago if Trump "didn't have the protections of a sitting president." Obviously positioning yourself to argue that Mueller could not deliver because Trump can not be indicted.

I see. You have evolved. Yeh, that's it.
 
Interesting too that in the past when the question of indicting a sitting president came up, you and your ilk liked to point out that it had not been settled in court yet. Now that the time for Mueller to deliver is arriving, you start to walk sideways like a crab and say that the FBI would have brought charges long ago if Trump "didn't have the protections of a sitting president." Obviously positioning yourself to argue that Mueller could not deliver because Trump can not be indicted.

I see. You have evolved. Yeh, that's it.

I’m not positing anything. The bar is much higher, if even reachable for a sitting president to face criminal charges.

Mueller and Rosenstein will determine if Trump has done anything chargeable and if so whether to charge him.
 
Mueller and Rosenstein will determine if Trump has done anything chargeable and if so whether to charge him.

No. They have already decided they cannot get either an indictment or a conviction on the obstruction or collusion/not a crime anyway. As I have consistently said, in the end Mueller will wont be able to do the deed and will just dump a bunch of shit on to Congress hoping they will work him over some more on a bogus impeachment attempt. Also, as discussed, he will try to kneecap either Jared or Don Jr. on some minor witch hunt thing because that's how pussies like Mueller roll when they cannot make the big kill.

And no, scalps from the sideplayers cannot be cobbled together to compensate for Muellers inability to get it up. again, as discussed.
 
Back
Top