Quote from iceman1:
go FUCK yourself SATAN... and FUCK your camel as well a-hole!!
:eek:
IcE
The quandary the US now has to deal with is:
1) They have Bush's pre-emptive stike policy in place against all questionable nations/religious movements that delegates WOMD, I mean, military force to go in and
try to rid the good guys of the bad guys;
2) Israel did just that by whacking Yassin to save Sharon whose religion (of the Jews) is based upon being Christ killers, the Savior USA claims to be founded upon ("Christianity").
3) This makes Palestine a terrorist harboring nation (since Yassin was murdered DUE to being seen as a terrorist by Israel) - therefore any and all remnants of Hamas are still being harbored there.
4) The US government is neither condemning the attack on Yassin nor approving it but rather claiming "no involvement" and yet another reason to manufacture and pass around Tylenol.
5) Yassin had no WOMD with him in his wheelchair (unless you can claim the rubber on his wheels are bad for the environment as it released black smoke into the air while burning after the rocket missile hit him) yet was slaughtered as a terrorist/father of terrorism... "mother of all terrorists??". That put Palestine squarely into Bush's little red book of nations needing to be exterminated for potentially harboring WOMD/terrorists. Therefore Bush MUST go to war with Palestine OR disavow Israel therfore set up POW camps in America and place all Jews occupying America into them, Nazi style.
Is that why Soros called Bush a Nazi?
Therefore, where does that place Bush's administration as pertaining to Palestine?
6) If Bush's administration condemns Yassin's assassination like the rest of the world and Arab world is doing, it also says Israel was WRONG for doing the Yassin strike that may NOT be able to be swept under the carpet.
And if Bush says Israel is WRONG for doing the strike (judge and executioner) on Yassin while he was on his way to pray in a mosque in a wheelchair, terrorist style, then that would be a sudden reversal in Bush's admin regarding doing pre-emptive strikes against individuals/nations who are either perceived as terrorists or as harboring WOMD.
7) And a reversal would mean the Bush admin's credibility / whole purpose for the Iraq occupation goes right down the tubes along with the S&P, Bush's ratings, and the USA's standing in the world's sight.

<-- PROUD to be an American!
Saham "I do NOT support terrorism so please do not fire a rocket/missile from a helicopter at ME - I'm just going out to get some ice cream, HONEST" Ruach