Who else would it be?Well right now you’re just guessing that an increase in volume is an institution. How good are your guesses? Probably about 50%. Maybe less. ![]()
If I can be right 50% of the time I'll do really well. I make money with 40%
Who else would it be?Well right now you’re just guessing that an increase in volume is an institution. How good are your guesses? Probably about 50%. Maybe less. ![]()
Any number of things — mainly random aggregations of orders. Institutions by and large trade dark or through algos that track a % of adv. Anyone telling you that a spike in volume is institutional buying is lying to you. I’m not saying that there aren’t ways to track institutional buying, but those are beyond a simple price and volume chart.Who else would it be?
What do you mean it's a name for a course?
I'm convinced that smart money exists. Someone is profiting from the way the market moves. Who do you think is creating supply and demand?
You have to realize that the stock market is not there for you to make money. It's there for the people who run the market to make money.
Not unlike any other market, be it cars or food or clothing, you might be able to find an opportunity to take advantage of the way things are run, but the market was never intended to make money for the customer.
I question whether a 40% win rate and a 40% edge are the same thing. I tend to make more money with my winning trades than I lose when I get stopped out. I'm not sure if you can define that as an edge.And you’d still lose money at 50% because you have to pay the bid/ask spread. Simple maths.
Anyone who claims they can make money on a 40% edge merely does not understand their claim lol.