Why are you worrying about another resolution?Quote from Talas:
In the process of attempting cement my understanding of Jack's PV framework, I've run into a few conceptual questions that I'm hoping someone more familiar with the reasoning behind the mechanics could answer...
Are the following statements accurate ?
(1) A tape on one resolution is a channel on some finer resolution.
(2) A flaw on one resolution is a channel on some finer resolution.
(3) The difference between a channel, a tape, and a flaw (at a given resolution) is the rate at which the PV cycle occurs. (typically with rate inversely correlating with volume)
Spyder ? Mak ? (anyone else who understands beyond the mechanics?)
Regards,
- Talas
We only deal with one resolution -- 5m for ES, and 2m for YM.
A Tape is a tape is a tape...
Look at the tape in front of you, study the flaw you have, there is no time (nor the need) to worry about another resolution.

)