Quote from No. 6:
why didn't you identify a FTT @11:05 or @11:25 and reverse your short positions?
Quote from No. 6:
wasn't a clear FTT evident @these levels?
Quote from No. 6:
where did you exit your short??
Quote from Spydertrader:
Neither of those bars represent FTT's
Note the Yellow Highlighted Area (1) on the attached chart. The 11:00 Bar opens and then heads lower creating a volatility expansion (Orange Arrow). At its low, Price reverses and heads higher (Green Arrow). Closing at the high of 11:00 and then opening at the same level on the 11:05 bar, price continues higher (Black Arrow) until reaching its high of the 11:05 bar where Price then heads lower (Red Arrow) and closes at the low of the 11:05 Bar. At 11:10 AM, Price opens, one tic higher than the close of the 11:05 bar. At this point, even if one considered the 11:05 bar an FTT (at the Open of the 11:10 bar), Volume does not confirm it. Price immediately heads lower showing increasing red volume. Since one needed to see decreasing black volume for one to have an FTT in a down channel, we cannot have an FTT at 11:05. The 11:05 bar represents nothing more than a failed Left to Right (LTR) Traverse.
At 11:25, One could have very easily mistaken this Price Action for an FTT. However, in reality what we see here is a flaw (Specifically, a Dip). Note the vastly lower volume level at 11:20 compared to the 11:15 bar. When Price moves to the 11:25 bar, we see continuation to the down side until Price reaches its low. One could have chosen to view the 11:25 bar as an FTT at this point (instead of seeing it as a Dip). If so, one would then need to see decreasing black volume with the 11:30 Bar. Since we see increasing red volume at the 11:30 bar on a PRV basis, even if you did see 11:25 as an FTT (and not part of the Dip Flaw), then you'd know the market signaled continuation down compared to change.
Edit: In other words, if you view the 11:25 bar as an FTT, then 11:30 becomes an FBO.
Please review my posts with respect to trading on the 'Forest Level Resolution' within this thread.
- Spydertrader
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1400802>
Quote from Spydertrader:
Neither of those bars represent FTT's
Note the Yellow Highlighted Area (1) on the attached chart. The 11:00 Bar opens and then heads lower creating a volatility expansion (Orange Arrow). At its low, Price reverses and heads higher (Green Arrow). Closing at the high of 11:00 and then opening at the same level on the 11:05 bar, price continues higher (Black Arrow) until reaching its high of the 11:05 bar where Price then heads lower (Red Arrow) and closes at the low of the 11:05 Bar. At 11:10 AM, Price opens, one tic higher than the close of the 11:05 bar. At this point, even if one considered the 11:05 bar an FTT (at the Open of the 11:10 bar), Volume does not confirm it. Price immediately heads lower showing increasing red volume. Since one needed to see decreasing black volume for one to have an FTT in a down channel, we cannot have an FTT at 11:05. The 11:05 bar represents nothing more than a failed Left to Right (LTR) Traverse.
At 11:25, One could have very easily mistaken this Price Action for an FTT. However, in reality what we see here is a flaw (Specifically, a Dip). Note the vastly lower volume level at 11:20 compared to the 11:15 bar. When Price moves to the 11:25 bar, we see continuation to the down side until Price reaches its low. One could have chosen to view the 11:25 bar as an FTT at this point (instead of seeing it as a Dip). If so, one would then need to see decreasing black volume with the 11:30 Bar. Since we see increasing red volume at the 11:30 bar on a PRV basis, even if you did see 11:25 as an FTT (and not part of the Dip Flaw), then you'd know the market signaled continuation down compared to change.
Edit: In other words, if you view the 11:25 bar as an FTT, then 11:30 becomes an FBO.
Please review my posts with respect to trading on the 'Forest Level Resolution' within this thread.
- Spydertrader
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1400802>
Quote from Steve Tvardek:
Good explanation! Was there anything on the YM at this time that you found helpful in seeing this develop in addition to what you've described on the ES?