Quote from martys:
Yahoo quarter is also positive for the quarter but negative for the annual:
Quote from martys:
Should we be looking at quarterly EPS or annual EPS? Thanks.
I think that is where the difference coming from.
Quote from Spydertrader:
I agree with you. The differences resulted from quarterly vs yearly EPS data. I have personally always used yearly data. However, since Stocktables.com has it ranked at 81 (as mark1 pointed out), go with it and add it in.
- Spydertrader
Quote from Spydertrader:
If your analysis suggests a stock (or several stocks) should move lower in price (or not at all), and those particular stocks gap and run in the opposite direction, then I suggest it does count.
No you didn't. I have quoted you directly.
Perhaps, you could provide more clarity in future contributions.
Price Action Analysis which involves some mysterious date in the future, rather than, today's Watch List doesn't really provide much direction now does it?
When you 'predict' a lower price, and the price trades higher, you should not expect to receive a 'correct' score for that prediction.
Thank-you again, for providing an example of what not to do when trading these methods. Following your analysis would have cost people money today. Perhaps accuracy isn't a top priority in your journal, but here, we run a much tighter ship. In the real world, inaccurate predictions have consequences. Those consequences may involve significant loss of capital. I suggest you refrain from dispensing 'price action' advice in this Journal until you can at least maintain an accuracy level above that of a coin flip.
Again, continued success on your trading career and with your Journal.
- Spydertrader
on 11/30/05 Richardson 54 commented:
I am one of the lurkers who have been monitoring Spytrader's posts for a couple of months while undergoing the requisite training (reviewing Journals I and II). I stumbled upon the thread while testing scripts on the Wealth-Lab site.
That said, I'd like to add a possible corollary to the methodology.
In monitoring the hot list this morning I noticed that BOOM's volume really began to head north yesterday in the final hour of trading. In effect, if the last hour of trading shows increased volume and the beginning of the current day's trading shows the same level of increasing volume (all other indicators being positive) then I'd suggest that the lower band was hit just prior to the observed "boom" in BOOM this morning.
Using that calculus, I dove into the buy fifteen minutes ahead of the stampede.
My suggestion is that we begin to observe the last hour of the previous day to see if the rules might be modified to include that action in the buy determination.
Quote from Spydertrader:
I agree with you. The differences resulted from quarterly vs yearly EPS data. I have personally always used yearly data. However, since Stocktables.com has it ranked at 81 (as mark1 pointed out), go with it and add it in.
- Spydertrader