SPX Has Topped For The Year Or Pabst Will Leave ET

Duhhhh, you don't "see" me in trading, because I don't post in trading.

Tripple Doh!



Quote from thorn:

You do???

Why is it then that i've never, ever seen you in trading, and i've never, ever seen you make a trading call?

Oh, you must be a paper trader. That's why. Go back to chit chat where you belong.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Duhhhh, you don't "see" me in trading, because I don't post in trading.


My point exactly moron. Only the truly good traders on ET, and there are very few, dare to post their ideas in "trading". Obviously, you are not one of them.
 
You competition junkies are so funny.

The market isn't enough, is it?

Of course, after one of the most horrific calls, making the trade all about YOU and not really the markets, you fail to keep your word.

No surprise, at all...

But hey, do your ad hominem deal, it works on the small minded, who don't really want to deal with the obvious of your word having no value...

p.s. So RM is a genious, and you are also the one who thinks Hitler is a genious...very funny.
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

At least Thorn has a kettle to piss in.

Being the jealous, socialist scumbag that you are, causes you great rage over the success of Thorn and Reardon Metal. Just yesterday from the chat log:

Pabst (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:29 PM)
RM is a genious

ZZZzzzzzzz (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:33 PM)
oy vey

cognitis (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:36 PM)
who's RM

cognitis (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:45 PM)
resinate?

Pabst (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:45 PM)
Reardon Metal

resinate (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:53 PM)
I love, "2 factors that cause sexual repression"

resinate (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:55 PM)
?

ZZZzzzzzzz (Oct 2, 2006 2:26:55 PM)
genious has a whole new meaning


Reardon Metal is like Brad Pitt cool. Now how BAD does that make you feel?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Quote from riskarb:

You have to assume any system with a +expectancy must carry that expectancy through many macro releases.

Certainly. When people backtest, they rarely match reports to the charts. So why do it going forward. The system either works or it doesn't.
 
I see we have a WWF tag team at work.

LOL...

Quote from thorn:

I cannot believe i've stumbled onto a bigger loser than bozente. What's wrong w you ZZloser? Are you still upset about the 2000 election vote count?
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

You competition junkies are so funny.

The market isn't enough, is it?


I cannot believe i've stumbled onto a bigger loser than bozente. What's wrong w you ZZloser? Are you still upset about the 2000 election vote count?
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

I see we have a WWF tag team at work.

LOL...

I bet when your computer gets shut off tonite, and you find yourself in your pathetic reality, there are no more "lol" 's.

To the kids at home, what has happened to ZZloser is what will happen to you if u spend all your years upset about the 2000 election vote count.
 
Suckers bet on things they can't know...like market tops.

LOL...

Quote from thorn:

I bet when your computer gets shut off tonite, and you find yourself in your pathetic reality, there are no more "lol" 's.

To the kids at home, what has happened to ZZloser is what will happen to you if u spend all your years upset about the 2000 election vote count.
 
Quote from Buy1Sell2:

Certainly. When people backtest, they rarely match reports to the charts. So why do it going forward. The system either works or it doesn't.

I of course agree with you and riskarb. No two ways about it. But by the same token there's many systems that fail to account for the tremendous slippage in the aftermath of data. It's rarely a huge issue in the indices but Treasuries' and FX become hideously illiquid during payroll. Sometimes I'll see a tested system kick in a long 6 ticks into a one minute/30 tick bond rally and the reality is, he NEVER could have gotten that price.
 
Back
Top