Andy:
Funny you should mention this. I'm experimenting with the idea of putting on spreads 60 days out. I already have a January FOTM bear call position. My goal is to try and keep 50 to 75% of the premium and get out.
Haven't thought through the margin points your mentioning, but I too would like to put on a little more margin. I feel like this is possible with bear calls (again, I can see the catastrophe coming) but, for me, not bull puts (subject to black swan events).
Funny you should mention this. I'm experimenting with the idea of putting on spreads 60 days out. I already have a January FOTM bear call position. My goal is to try and keep 50 to 75% of the premium and get out.
Haven't thought through the margin points your mentioning, but I too would like to put on a little more margin. I feel like this is possible with bear calls (again, I can see the catastrophe coming) but, for me, not bull puts (subject to black swan events).
Quote from andysmith:
I wanted to see if there is a way to put more money to work on credit spreads without increasing risk outright. Well, there isn't, but the following might be an interesting step in the right direction and I'm requesting some feedback.
The Problem: I haven't been thrilled with the credit received for safe, far OTM spreads with 30 days to expiration. If I want to get a decent credit, I have to go closer to the money than I'd like to.
Now I've read/heard several times that it is "safer" to go out 2 to 3 months such that the spread can be farther OTM than a 30-days-to-expiration spread. Mathematically, this does not make sense but intuitively, it seems safer. Why?
So here's the thought. Instead of using 50% of capital (as margin) on a 30-day spread each month, put 35% on a 60-day spread. One month into the 60 days, put on another 60-day spread using another 35% of capital. You are always 70% invested and even though you have 60-day spreads, you have an expiration event every month. You can do the same thing with 90-day spreads using 25% of capital each month.
