SpreadProfessor Openings

Quote from Peternam:

In case your past 18 year track record s...., use one of the above to build up a track record.


P.S. I contacted a prop shop and the only thing they required from me was a 1 year track record (no references from my mother, sister...)
More...


"bone"

#1) your continued dread of anyone actually seeing your audited results. You flail and spit and insult and yell and contort and threaten and change direction every time this comes up. I can give you 10 different sites to have your trades independently audited

-----Why are you terrified of doing this?

-----What would independent results show about your methods?

-----Why do you tremble at the thought of having sunlight stream in, and showing truth about your validity?

-----Why do you keep avoiding this subject?

-----Why do you never directly respond to this reasonable request?

-----Why do you NOT want your prospects to see how much money that YOU make?

#2 Disprove that you are not using aliases. Now a new one appears - that seems to make at least 3. How come the people defending you all have less than 5 posts? That is the pattern of many other people who have come here in the past, and anonymous aliases pipe up in their defense.
 
I am not an alias. I am in Chicago. Anyone want to contact me to verify that I am not Bone, please do so. I will give you my details over email. Remember, the bottom line decision is yours whether you take an educational course or not. Let's stop the bitching..
 
Quote from TraderZones:



#2 Disprove that you are not using aliases. Now a new one appears - that seems to make at least 3. How come the people defending you all have less than 5 posts? That is the pattern of many other people who have come here in the past, and anonymous aliases pipe up in their defense.
More...

You know it is logically impossible to prove a negative right?
 
1) Wrong, b. Disproving something is a classic proof of logic. For example, disprove that 4+4=7. Using various mathematic truths, then 4+4=7 ==> (1+1+1+1) + (1+1+1+1)=(1+1+1+1+1+1+1)==> 8=7, so 4+4=7 is false. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_contradiction

2) Now a better question. What is the logical, statistical or mathematic chances that four anonymous posters (RONIN168, Crowsfeet, Benihaha, TripleNickel) would crop up in the last 10 days, with "all" their posts only in this thread, and all defending bone? And yet the posts by people having 50+ posts are mixed towards him? When this exact same thing is a constant problem on ET, with vendors using aliases or shills to defend or promote thtemselves. How come none of the newbies are neutral or negative?

And rather than shrugging it off, bone tells several people he will pay them $10,000 if any of those are his aliases (which of course, leaves open the chances of "shills"), when he knows it is a simple matter for someone using aliases to use different IP addresses and free email accounts or other people on a non-verifying site such as ET? Wouldn't it be simpler just to get audited?

3) Getting back to the above post, why is bone so averse to the very very very very reasonable request that he use one of the many (some free) auditing sites? When anyone wanting to manage money makes hard efforts to prove their skills & wares via auditing? Since probably 99% of the signal/method sellers on such auditing sites obviously fail, why is bone not in a hurry to prove he is one of the 1%?
 
Quote from TraderZones:

1) Wrong, b. Disproving something is a classic proof of logic. For example, disprove that 4+4=7. Using various mathematic truths, then 4+4=7 ==> (1+1+1+1) + (1+1+1+1)=(1+1+1+1+1+1+1)==> 8=7, so 4+4=7 is false. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_contradiction

2) Now a better question. What is the logical, statistical or mathematic chances that four anonymous posters (RONIN168, Crowsfeet, Benihaha, TripleNickel) would crop up in the last 10 days, with "all" their posts only in this thread, and all defending bone? And yet the posts by people having 50+ posts are mixed towards him? When this exact same thing is a constant problem on ET, with vendors using aliases or shills to defend or promote thtemselves. How come none of the newbies are neutral or negative?
More...

1. The example you use is horrible and does not relate. Like I said, how can Bone disprove that he is without a doubt not using multiple aliases? That doesn't even make sense, and the burden of proof would be on you. What you asked is like saying prove God does not exist. It doesn't make sense. This is what happened. Bone is accused of having multiple aliases, and then he says prove it. You then tell him to disprove the assumption that was already made. You should look up the argument of ignorance. It fits really well here.

2. I'd say the chances are pretty good when a few random people resurrect a 3 month old thread to bad mouth him. You should really put things in context. Things would make more sense.
 
Quote from Benihana:

1. The example you use is horrible and does not relate.
More...

YOU ---> You know it is logically impossible to prove a negative right? your unsubstantiated opinion

EXAMPLE ---> 4+4=7 shows you are incorrect. A negative can be proven from a logical point of view.

YOU ---> The example you use is horrible and does not relate.again, multiple unsubstantiated opinions demonstrating you have no clue about logic and now on ignore
 
Mods, Can you please try and update your forum software so that I do not get new post notification for the esteemed members of my ignore list (TraderZones et. al.)?
 
lol, I like how you ignored about 3/4ths of my post. Plus you never answered the points I made earlier, pretty funny. How is Bone suppose to disprove he isn't making aliases? I guess you really are just hateful and troll like.
 
Hydroblunt:

I'm trading two accounts at the moment. There's actually alot of private capital available without having to involve FoF's or introducing agents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top