Of course not. He took off for 3 months in the middle of his six month contract term for his European vacation, and then wanted to start all over again. He's not going to get much out of the training if he chooses not to put in the time to meet with me or to put in the work.
In fact, here is an email excerpt from me to him:
"On April 02, 2012, you received a very large cache of proprietary files and studies and data from me via email - well over 100 individual files. You had a few meetings with me in April, you started to send me a few paper trades in early May as I encouraged and requested of you - and then you fall off the face of the earth. You quit sending me the paper trades for me to review. You no longer scheduled individual webinars with me. You no longer wanted to make an effort from what I can tell as I look through my Skype and email communiques. In September, I started inviting you to group meetings which you could not make, and the only way I can send you the recordings is via Skype which apparently you do not have the ability to download correctly. The rest of my clients can. Over 40 clients received that Skype file on October 25th. You cancelled the transmission from what I can tell.
And now you want 75% of the fee back. Today I made you the following offer: "If you would like for me to extend your contract for two months I would consider it gratis if you would make a real commitment and effort to participate. I would be happy to meet with you twice a week during US hours individually. But the contract is very clear in terms of refunds."
I think any reasonable and clear thinking individual would see that I have done everything reasonable and appropriate to accommodate you. I did not hear a peep out of you for three months. Three month European summer holidays don't void contracts. I didn't take a three month holiday - I was very busy working with clients and trading for myself."
I take my hat off to you @bone , for the first time in 3 days, you've posted CONTENT, I semi believe that this is a genuine email. But to your misfortune, it will only arouse in other readers why, after digging up a 2 year old email, you fail consistently to back up your claim at being a 'professor'.
A professor - "a university academic of the highest rank; the holder of a university chair." Obviously you are not a professor in the literal sense. But you are neither in the sense that you are skilled or an expert. You can not provide any detail to suggest otherwise. You provide very little CONTENT and most posts just revert back to "we this... and commercials that", your standard sales tactic that intimates some higher level of understanding.
Maybe Julien was a poor 'student' or maybe he was shocked at the lack of content you could provide. But you have unwittingly exposed yourself once again.