For those in Equities, an extraordinary piece making the rounds among serious traders:
http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4661.html
http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4661.html
For those in Equities, an extraordinary piece making the rounds among serious traders:
http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4661.html
I just wish they would let the data speak for itself instead of littering it with anti HFT propoganda.
The problem is that the data does not speak for itself. Eric is well known for jumping to conclusions and creating hysteria where it doesn't always need to be.
Well, I think the evidence he presented clearly shows that market fragmentation is the cause of orders not being executed. That data, when broken down they way it was speaks for itself. But his blame for the problem is misdirected at HFTs, when it should be directed at big brother.
So many are so quick to throw HFT under the bus and Eric seems to be the ringleader of misinformation.I guess I can agree with that. I'm not a fan of the fragmentation. However, I am an even less of a fan of Eric. Anytime I see an article of his quoted, it gets me going.So many are so quick to throw HFT under the bus and Eric seems to be the ringleader of misinformation.
Interesting article by John Arnold on spoofing at Traders Magazine today, "It Takes a Spoofer to Keep the Speed Traders Honest":
http://www.tradersmagazine.com/news...o-keep-the-speed-traders-honest-113377-1.html