I do agree with you 100% speedo. In a way, I'd like to give back to the community that got me started, so I'd like to show how its important to differentiate between that which looks good but can't be verified, and that which has the checks and balances in place.
SP500 - High Probability predictions for 2016
- Thread starter Autodidact
- Start date
It is kind of irrelevant to the purpose of this thread. It is a prediction thread, not a trading one. Your prediction so far sucked giant whale ass, and my prediction has just been fulfilled. You could be the best trader all I know, but you shouldn't be cocky about predictions because that is MY world.
Good luck with your longs...
Can I be part of that world too. Needless to say, I can piss pretty far as well.
I apologize in advance for bitching, but I feel it's important, or rather imperative, that I get the story in perspective.
1) OP made this prediction on 01/04/2016.
2) His prediction was to have lasted for the entire 2016 since he never clearly stated when SP500 would break out above the resistance.
3) He needed 90 additional days to make more accurate (> 90%) prediction.
4) It took just 10 days for his call that "2015 lows will hold" to fail.
How can a guy who claims that his calls are 90% accurate fail so miserably?
On the contrary, above quote was this noob's call.
1) Didn't the ES initially drop below 1945 as stated?
2) Didn't it then stopped cold at 1900?
3) Didn't it rise back up to 1945?
4) Then what happened? It dropped back down to 1875.
But this is not about me. I don't pretend my calls are 90% accurate.
But what's friggin' disturbing is that when I disagreed with his heroic call, he challenged me to make a (monetary) bet. When I accepted, he gave excuse after excuse--but that's another story.
1) OP made this prediction on 01/04/2016.
2) His prediction was to have lasted for the entire 2016 since he never clearly stated when SP500 would break out above the resistance.
3) He needed 90 additional days to make more accurate (> 90%) prediction.
4) It took just 10 days for his call that "2015 lows will hold" to fail.
How can a guy who claims that his calls are 90% accurate fail so miserably?
On the contrary, above quote was this noob's call.
1) Didn't the ES initially drop below 1945 as stated?
2) Didn't it then stopped cold at 1900?
3) Didn't it rise back up to 1945?
4) Then what happened? It dropped back down to 1875.
But this is not about me. I don't pretend my calls are 90% accurate.
But what's friggin' disturbing is that when I disagreed with his heroic call, he challenged me to make a (monetary) bet. When I accepted, he gave excuse after excuse--but that's another story.
I was wrong, made a bad call, and everyone else was right in calling the low breach, Romik, Pekelo, Schizo etc., we certainly took SPX 2015 lows this week, took a few manageable losses in some options positions, and it will happen again.
Good trading to all hope you guys made some good money shorting, best wishes for the rest of the year, hope even more money is made then.
Peace and no hard feelings.
Good trading to all hope you guys made some good money shorting, best wishes for the rest of the year, hope even more money is made then.
Peace and no hard feelings.
Last edited:
Appreciate reading this. The fact of the matter is that I think many of us actually like what you write often, I know I do, and I see lots of other guys say this. (most recent was your post where you said that you don't short lower lows, you short lower highs of course) Its just that when some things don't start to line up, you have to question everything.
Anyway, that's just my 2 cents.
Last edited: