You are entertaining at times but the delusional aspects of your posts seem to be increasing rapidly. Just a friendly reminder that once you go to ignore, there is no return.
Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
You are entertaining at times but the delusional aspects of your posts seem to be increasing rapidly. Just a friendly reminder that once you go to ignore, there is no return.
Oh no! Getting put on ignore by KKK !!!! Whatever will we do? lol
Of course the ignorant choose to ignore. Probably holding his ears and yelling so he can't hear either. Like a kid having a tantrum.
That somehow the Trumpers can equate what Clinton did vs what Donny Dumbo has done just goes to show what ignorant, illogical, just plain dumb, people they are.
Of course the ignorant choose to ignore. Probably holding his ears and yelling so he can't hear either. Like a kid having a tantrum.
That somehow the Trumpers can equate what Clinton did vs what Donny Dumbo has done just goes to show what ignorant, illogical, just plain dumb, people they are.
You're right, there is in fact a difference. Clinton did in fact break the law. Comey said as much himself as he outlined her offenses during the now infamous press conference. Comey then took the role of being prosecutor, judge and jury and decided that Clinton did not "intend" to break those laws which he detailed. One, that was not his job to do. Secondly, and most importantly, intent is irrelevant in determining guilt or innocence. This fact is, as per usual, ignored by leftists as it destroys the narrative. It's for a judge and jury to determine the outcome of her investigation. Now her intent, or lack thereof may have some bearing during the sentencing should she be found guilty in a court of law, which is where this belongs. Perhaps a kind hearted judge could be found to oversee the trial and then give her a lighter sentence if found guilty because she didn't "intend" to break the law, but the bottom line it was not for Comey, or you, or me, or the media to decide. Until this evidence as outlined by Comey is presented in a courtroom during trial, this case remains a travesty of justice.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
He emphasized clearly that it didn't meet that threshold. He stated negligent, but not criminal, and you can find it on youtube, moron.
You dumbfvcks really need to impeach Hillary or Google false-equivalence and tu quoque. Hillary's "negligence" has nothing to do with arguing Trump's treason.
Again, not for him to determine. That was for Lynch to decide, but that would have put the ball too close to the Obama administration with an obvious implication of collusion. Hence, it got laid off on him.
He makes a recommendation to Lynch, correct. Now what does this have to do with Trump's obstruction, collusion and the three plea deals made thus far? Hillary is guilty so they should share a cell, numbnuts?
You speak as if Trump has been found guilty of said charges. He hasn't, which makes you just another rambling member of the lunatic left. Again, I must educate you that it was not for Comey to decide.
I have many people on ignore myself.
However, the conclusion of the fbi is on my side. If anyone is delusional it’s those that keep pushing Hillary Clinton committed espionage.
YOU speak as if HRC should be hanged. Trump and associates are being investigated by a Special Counsel.
Playing dumb won't work, smurf.
The tu quoque argument, isn't. His guilt or innocence, as it is conjoined to HRC, is uncorrelated to HRC's "bad judgment" as stated by Comey.
AG Jeff Sessions has been asked, in televised hearings, to appoint an SC to investigate HRC--what's the hold-up?