SOTU - Global Warming is a FACT

[futurecurrents]

jem you piece of lying shit. Nobody ever said 97% of scientists agree. Least of all meteorologists, half of whom are deluded Fox News watchers.


The 97% applies to climatologists.

The essentially every science organization in the world applies to essentially every science organization in the world.

One paper out of 2400 denied AGW.

No science organization in the world denies it.

 

[futurecurrents]

Something similar occurred with a different set of experts within AMS: meteorologists and atmospheric scientists. Those who published a lot on climate change, or a lot on other aspects of meteorological science, generally showed much higher conviction that humans are contributing to global warming (79 percent and 78 percent, respectively) than the "nonpublishing" experts (59 percent).

And there's more bad news for skeptics who want to cite this AMS survey to bolster their case. You see, the study also showed that conservative political ideology is a big factor behind the denial of climate science by some meteorologists

 

[fhl]

If you like your ridiculous global warming theory, you can keep your ridiculous global warming theory.

 

[nitro]

Futurecurrents, I have never seen anyone as relentless as you about Global Warming.

I think you would enjoy this book immensely (it is first rate storytelling), and in fact so would everyone else in this debate:

Windfall: The Booming Business of Global Warming [Kindle Edition]
McKenzie Funk (Author)

http://www.amazon.com/Windfall-Boom...=UTF8&qid=1391701614&sr=8-1&keywords=windfall

In the book, you will find statements like, "If we know the risks, why aren't we doing anything? The center's director, Elke Weber, suggests that at both levels where humans make their decisions - emotional and analytical - there are roadblocks. The emotional bock: What we don't see doesn't scare us. The time-delayed, abstract and often statistical nature of the risks of global warming does not evoke strong visceral reactions...".

But what makes the book a page turner are the stories. In fact, it is probably MUST reading.

 

[jem]

you fraudulent little drone.

a. 41 papers out of 10,000 claimed CO2 was responsible for warming.

b. many meteorologists are real climate scientists.

c. many "climatologists" went through watered down science programs and non rigorous science classes. I have a relative who went through such a program at an ivy league.

Many real scientists with rigorous science degrees related to climate state that man made global warming has not been proven.

jem you piece of lying shit. Nobody ever said 97% of scientists agree. Least of all meteorologists, half of whom are deluded Fox News watchers.


The 97% applies to climatologists.

The essentially every science organization in the world applies to essentially every science organization in the world.

One paper out of 2400 denied AGW.

No science organization in the world denies it.

 

[jem]

I can see you realized your mistake. you learned a lot of meteorologists are so called climate scientists.

Something similar occurred with a different set of experts within AMS: meteorologists and atmospheric scientists. Those who published a lot on climate change, or a lot on other aspects of meteorological science, generally showed much higher conviction that humans are contributing to global warming (79 percent and 78 percent, respectively) than the "nonpublishing" experts (59 percent).

And there's more bad news for skeptics who want to cite this AMS survey to bolster their case. You see, the study also showed that conservative political ideology is a big factor behind the denial of climate science by some meteorologists