SOTU - Global Warming is a FACT

[Lucrum]

... Whereas I have the virtually the entire world's science community behind me...

You gonna let'em fuck you in the ass - again?

 

[gwb-trading]

Again with the dopey images. It's all the dope has. Whereas I have the virtually the entire world's science community behind me.

Please, gwb, just shut the fuck up you fucking lying moron.

So once again you have proven that all you can do is call other's names.

I will once again invite you to read 48 pages of detailed material...

The 97% CONSENSUS? NO! GLOBAL WARMING MATH MYTHS & SOCIAL PROOFS.
The “Science” of Statisticulation
http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf

"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."

Please provide detailed refutation of the information in the report you believe to be incorrect - listing page and paragraph.
A failure to provide clear feedback will only serve to further prove that you have reading and reasoning comprehension issues.

 

[futurecurrents]

So once again you have proven that all you can do is call other's names.

I will once again invite you to read 48 pages of detailed material...

The 97% CONSENSUS? NO! GLOBAL WARMING MATH MYTHS & SOCIAL PROOFS.


You are lying you gullible moron. It's a bullshit study that places impossible criteria for what is considered "agreement". There is NO NEED FOR THE AUTHORS TO EXPRESSLY STATE THIS. Why can't you understand this dickhead?

Look asshole. The consensus on AGW is so universal and accepted that the burden of proof is on the deniers to prove they deny it. The authors of the papers were contacted and they confirmed it.

FACT IS ONLY ONE PAPER OUT OF OVER TWO THOUSAND DENIED AGW.

THERE IS NO SCIENCE ORGANIZATION THAT DENIES IT. VIRTUALLY ALL THEM AGREE WITH IT. ARE YOU SO STUPID THAT YOU THINK IT IS NOT A SIMILAR HUGE MAJORITY OF CLIMATOLOGISTS THAT ALSO AGREE?


97%.........

 

[gwb-trading]

So once again you have proven that all you can do is call other's names.

I will once again invite you to read 48 pages of detailed material...

The 97% CONSENSUS? NO! GLOBAL WARMING MATH MYTHS & SOCIAL PROOFS.


You are lying you gullible moron. It's a bullshit study that places impossible criteria for what is considered "agreement". There is NO NEED FOR THE AUTHORS TO EXPRESSLY STATE THIS. Why can't you understand this dickhead?

Look asshole. The consensus on AGW is so universal and accepted that the burden of proof is on the deniers to prove they deny it. The authors of the papers were contacted and they confirmed it.

FACT IS ONLY ONE PAPER OUT OF OVER TWO THOUSAND DENIED AGW.

THERE IS NO SCIENCE ORGANIZATION THAT DENIES IT. VIRTUALLY ALL THEM AGREE WITH IT. ARE YOU SO STUPID THAT YOU THINK IT IS NOT A SIMILAR HUGE MAJORITY OF CLIMATOLOGISTS THAT ALSO AGREE?


97%.........

"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."

 

[Lucrum]

"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."

So it's not 97% that agree with futurecunts. But 98.8% that disagree?

 

[futurecurrents]

"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."

When the criteria for what is considered "agree" is set at a ridiculous narrow definition. And most scientists do not want to go back that far since man-made global warming does not become high probability evident until the 1970's.



Multiple studies and direct polling of the scientists .........97%

Every science org in the world.

Common sense logic.

That's why the American Chemical Society says this

"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."

 

[futurecurrents]

"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."

In 2004, Naomi Oreskes performed a survey of all peer reviewed abstracts on the subject "global climate change" published between 1993 and 2003. She surveyed the ISI Web of Science database, looking only at peer reviewed, scientific articles. The survey failed to find a single paper that rejected the consensus position that global warming over the past 50 years is predominantly anthropogenic. 75% of the papers agreed with the consensus position while 25% made no comment either way (eg - focused on methods or paleoclimate analysis).

Benny Peiser's rebuttal

Benny Peiser repeated Oreskes survey and claimed to have found 34 peer reviewed studies rejecting the consensus. However, an inspection of each of the 34 studies reveals most of them don't reject the consensus at all. The remaining articles in Peiser's list are editorials or letters, not peer-reviewed studies. Peiser has since retracted his criticism of Oreskes survey:

"Only [a] few abstracts explicitly reject or doubt the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) consensus which is why I have publicly withdrawn this point of my critique. [snip] I do not think anyone is questioning that we are in a period of global warming. Neither do I doubt that the overwhelming majority of climatologists is agreed that the current warming period is mostly due to human impact."



And still denier morons quote this debunked "study" because lies and deceptions are they have.

 

[fhl]

 

[fhl]

 

[fhl]