Sorry, another Covid thread :-)

Well, this sucks. Peer reviewed paper showing the mRNA prix dramatically increase cancer rates:
Sorry, jab nuts - you may be winning the social media meaningless argument, but you're losing the reality argument:

Covid mRNA "Vaccines" Now Proven To Significantly Increase Risk of Cancer

A new peer-reviewed Japanese Study published on April 8, 2024 found, "Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer" after the third mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose in Japan.

The Japanese study cites several studies and several mechanisms of action that would explain the increase in several cancers after Covid "vaccination" to 2/3 of Japan in 2022.

"Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown."


https://www.cureus.com/articles/196...dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/
 
Pekelo said:
The farmer DIDN'T want to slaughter the birds, that is a worry some thing. You wanna eat infected chicken?
More...

I do not live where there's a problem with the Bird Flu. I believe almost every state has had an outbreak of Bird Flu since 2016. Yet, I do remember a story on Bloomberg TV about the price of eggs US, feeder cattle, and live cattle prices were sensitive commodities to the spread of the Bird Flu early in the Trump Presidency.


Simply, if I were a farmer who worked with poultry farms (chickens, geese, turkey & cows in the impacted states...I would be very worried because I do remember farm employees losing their jobs in Kentucky from an outbreak at several farms that had to slaughter their farm birds.

The highly lethal form of avian influenza circulating the globe since 2016 has killed tens of millions of birds, forced poultry farmers in the United States to slaughter entire flocks and prompted a brief but alarming spike in the price of eggs.

A highly contagious strain of bird flu is ripping through flocks of major egg producers around the U.S. It’s not just chickens being infected – dairy cows have also tested positive, and one person in Texas is believed to have caught the virus after working with affected cattle.

https://thehill.com/homenews/nexsta...ive-bird-flu-outbreak-will-food-prices-go-up/​

Yet, if I was a commodities trader...eggs, feeder cattle, and live cattle would be at the top of my list of markets to trade because volatility is good for any trader. Simply, farmers are concerned about Bird Flu...their jobs and health. America's consumers are concerned only about it at the grocery store involving food prices.

Some of the biggest commodities traders...farmers. I would not doubt conspiracy theorists showing up to blame the Bird Flu on farmers. :banghead:​

Also, I do remember the US Department of Agriculture’s discretionary spending budget cuts under the Trump/Pence administration and the concerns back then that such would encourage the spread of the Bird Flu...it was a big concern in rural America that many felt Trump was turning his back on them.

If Republicans win back the Oval Office and with Congress being so dysfunctional...I would expect the Bird Flu to continue having outbreaks across America because of the lack of funds to control it. Simply, higher food prices and lost farm jobs.

Yet, a big plus for commodities traders.​

The big worry involves the spread of Bird Flu to wildlife in Antarctica...a lot of endangered species could be wiped out. A big issue because it impacts the food chain of many other animals. I only know this because my daughter has a school project about why Penguins in Antarctica dying from the Bird Flu.

It's a global outbreak. ​

Regardless, my concern would be the impact on farmers and food prices at the grocery store especially in rural communities...more species of birds in rural than in urban communities.

High inflation everywhere in the world...high grocery store prices that occur because of Bird Flu is not helping consumers.

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
Here's a team of medical scientists, doctors and actuaries. It's a great 10k foot view of the overall SCAM that was Covid. The absolute nightmare of fraud that these murderers injected into society:

There was no pandemic by any reasonable definition – which must surely include that large numbers of previously healthy people in all age groups perished, whereas there was no discernible rise in global mortality in 2020.

The pandemic-believers respond to (1) above by claiming that there was nevertheless the spread of a novel pathogen from a point source (“lab-leak of a virus engineered through Gain of Function research”). They say this was a “nasty” virus and the harm caused resulted from “mishandling” or a lack of “early treatment”. However:
a) There is no evidence that viruses can be engineered so as to have dangerous pandemic potential – lab-leaks happen all the time.
b) The purported waves of deaths and serious illnesses appear decoupled from “spread” – there are no clusters or ripples of deaths or unusual illnesses evident; the “virus” bizarrely obeyed national and administrative boundaries to create different “pandemic outcomes”.
c) The virus and disease claimed to have been caused by it were certainly not “novel”. “Covid” was indistinguishable from the features of known respiratory infectious illnesses. Any purported novelty is explainable by observation and confirmation bias augmented by the most extensive and powerful propaganda campaign ever waged on humanity.

All the harms reported can be explained by a combination of:
a) Massive disruptions in health and social care: maltreatment, non-treatment or inappropriate treatment, especially of the infirm elderly
b) Misattribution of deaths to “Covid”
c) Other harms consequent to the response to the false perception that a novel deadly virus was circulating
d) Data fraud

The notion of “something spreading” resulted from the explosion in the number of over-sensitive and under-specific tests (especially PCR) being carried out which were merely finding a pre-existing signal which had already become widespread – and, crucially, without being noticed at all – before the purported emergency.

As these “positive cases” were found, a number of perverse incentives created a positive feedback loop involving more testing (especially of “contacts”), more “cases” demanding more testing, more “cases” being found and so on.

The timeline associated with the early weeks of the Covid era stretches credulity. We are meant to believe that the following all happened spontaneously within a 4-week period:
a) 27 Dec 2019 – Hubei hospital reports cases of pneumonia of unknown cause
b) 7 Jan 2020 – the “new virus” is isolated
c) 12 Jan 2020 – sequence uploaded to internet – from a patient in Wuhan with an otherwise unremarkable pneumonia
d) 22 Jan 2020 – a dashboard purporting to report cases and deaths globally in real time is set up and launched by John Hopkins University
e) 23 Jan 2020 – a paper describing a validated test (developed without access to patient material) is published, having been “peer-reviewed” within 24 hours of submission

“Lab leak” and “zoonotic spillover” theories are the two constituent parts of a deliberately engineered false dichotomy. By permitting argument between these two choices alone, the question as to whether we actually had a pandemic at all—and what therefore caused the myriad harms—is avoided. Yet BOTH theories have the same endpoint: the sustenance of the “Pandemic Preparedness Industry” which, flush with a hugely successful “Covid” episode will no doubt delight in the prospect of lucrative reruns.

The oft-repeated references to “the next pandemic”— even by some apparent “Covid dissidents”— is a foreshadowing of their intentions, because, remember, as they say:
“Any rogue lab can engineer these viruses now.”

After all, as we have argued, the actual escape of something from a lab is not required to generate a “pandemic”; the mere seeding of the narrative of escape, rollout of testing and resultant social contagion is all that is needed.



source to full article (above is a summary of findings): https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/policy-review-the-nature-of-the-events
 
misterkel said:
Here's a team of medical scientists, doctors and actuaries. It's a great 10k foot view of the overall SCAM that was Covid. The absolute nightmare of fraud that these murderers injected into society:

There was no pandemic by any reasonable definition – which must surely include that large numbers of previously healthy people in all age groups perished, whereas there was no discernible rise in global mortality in 2020.

The pandemic-believers respond to (1) above by claiming that there was nevertheless the spread of a novel pathogen from a point source (“lab-leak of a virus engineered through Gain of Function research”). They say this was a “nasty” virus and the harm caused resulted from “mishandling” or a lack of “early treatment”. However:
a) There is no evidence that viruses can be engineered so as to have dangerous pandemic potential – lab-leaks happen all the time.
b) The purported waves of deaths and serious illnesses appear decoupled from “spread” – there are no clusters or ripples of deaths or unusual illnesses evident; the “virus” bizarrely obeyed national and administrative boundaries to create different “pandemic outcomes”.
c) The virus and disease claimed to have been caused by it were certainly not “novel”. “Covid” was indistinguishable from the features of known respiratory infectious illnesses. Any purported novelty is explainable by observation and confirmation bias augmented by the most extensive and powerful propaganda campaign ever waged on humanity.

All the harms reported can be explained by a combination of:
a) Massive disruptions in health and social care: maltreatment, non-treatment or inappropriate treatment, especially of the infirm elderly
b) Misattribution of deaths to “Covid”
c) Other harms consequent to the response to the false perception that a novel deadly virus was circulating
d) Data fraud

The notion of “something spreading” resulted from the explosion in the number of over-sensitive and under-specific tests (especially PCR) being carried out which were merely finding a pre-existing signal which had already become widespread – and, crucially, without being noticed at all – before the purported emergency.

As these “positive cases” were found, a number of perverse incentives created a positive feedback loop involving more testing (especially of “contacts”), more “cases” demanding more testing, more “cases” being found and so on.

The timeline associated with the early weeks of the Covid era stretches credulity. We are meant to believe that the following all happened spontaneously within a 4-week period:
a) 27 Dec 2019 – Hubei hospital reports cases of pneumonia of unknown cause
b) 7 Jan 2020 – the “new virus” is isolated
c) 12 Jan 2020 – sequence uploaded to internet – from a patient in Wuhan with an otherwise unremarkable pneumonia
d) 22 Jan 2020 – a dashboard purporting to report cases and deaths globally in real time is set up and launched by John Hopkins University
e) 23 Jan 2020 – a paper describing a validated test (developed without access to patient material) is published, having been “peer-reviewed” within 24 hours of submission

“Lab leak” and “zoonotic spillover” theories are the two constituent parts of a deliberately engineered false dichotomy. By permitting argument between these two choices alone, the question as to whether we actually had a pandemic at all—and what therefore caused the myriad harms—is avoided. Yet BOTH theories have the same endpoint: the sustenance of the “Pandemic Preparedness Industry” which, flush with a hugely successful “Covid” episode will no doubt delight in the prospect of lucrative reruns.

The oft-repeated references to “the next pandemic”— even by some apparent “Covid dissidents”— is a foreshadowing of their intentions, because, remember, as they say:
“Any rogue lab can engineer these viruses now.”

After all, as we have argued, the actual escape of something from a lab is not required to generate a “pandemic”; the mere seeding of the narrative of escape, rollout of testing and resultant social contagion is all that is needed.



source to full article (above is a summary of findings): https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/policy-review-the-nature-of-the-events
More...

So just another anti-vax blog peddling completed debunked fabricated bullshiat. This is your "evidence".
 
UK Watchdog FINES Pfizer for Misleading the Public on the COVID Vaccines

Pfizer has come under scrutiny by the UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog, the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), for breaching the regulatory code five times.

The accusations stem from senior executives’ use of social media to promote an unlicensed COVID vaccine, alongside making misleading claims, such as the phrase “95% effective” and the declaration that children aged 5 to 11 would benefit from these shots.
 
“The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world.”

He says the fraudulent use of “experimental gene therapy to healthy people” was not only an “extreme violation of human rights,” but “the result was the induction of the terrible drug-induced injury that has never [been] seen in human history.”

- Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School.
 
We are ruled by the Health Bureaucrats:

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/uk-ons-denies-request-from-7-mps?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

The head of the UK ONS wrote a letter in response to a request from 7 members of Parliament saying that the vaccines are safe and they have better things to do with their time than run a report that would have taken them less than 1 hour of effort to do.


Why does the ONS get to decide over the Parliament? Who's in charge?
Why don't they want to do this?
The excuse that "It's so safe that we don't have to prove its safe," is pretty thin fare.

GWRB can sukdatdik all zhe/zhem wantz to, but non-slavering lapdogs for a corrupt system won/t.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top