Quote from bmwhendrix:
Yes, I do need to clarify this. (Actually knew it did not read right when I wrote it, but was in a hurry.)
PA is based on price movement and how price reacts at points of interest.
After considering said movement and reactions a situation may have what a particular trader considers enough of a probability of movement in a particular direction to place a trade.
As with so many things, yes and no. I stressed the probability aspect of this back at TL, but since so few people understood probability, I came up with the idea of the straight line because the whole probability thing is ancillary. And perhaps not even that.
Trading price is, among other things, about judging the balance between demand and supply, or buying pressure and selling pressure, and once one has determined which has the upper hand, he trades according to the path of least resistance. This has nothing to do with prediction or expectation or forecasting or anticipation or even probability. It has everything to do with understanding what one is looking at and judging which side has more traction at that moment. If one judges correctly, he wins. If he judges incorrectly, he loses. If he doesn't know enough to make a judgement, he does nothing.
The key, then, as I've said once or twice, is to understand just what it is that one is looking at, then determine who's got the wherewithal to make a move. If one doesn't understand what he's looking at, much less be able to make this determination, then he's just guessing, and it's not difficult to understand why he'd be looking for someone to tell him what to do, though why he's trading at all is a mystery.
Those who want to pursue this can read the pdf on demand and supply I posted yesterday. Those who don't want to are certainly not required to. But then they won't learn anything.
).