Quote from Munck:
I have noticed that pace-levels vary a lot across different platforms. I'm using TN (Thanks Spyder), and I'm very happy with it so far. In the Interative Thread people regularly post their pace-levels, last time some days ago.
These posted values are very different from the autogenerated ones in TN. A lot higher levels. That also goes for the pace line code in NinjaTrader.
Have anyone thought about this issue?
(the algorithm should be fairly simple)
Morten,
I really don't think it's worth worrying that much about absolutely precise values for DU. I rechecked my script for accuracy; here, just for informational purposes, are the parameters and stats for Monday-Thursday of last week:
Current Date = 07/11/2008 3:35:00 PM
Total Days = 4
Total Bars Included (1530 - 2200) = 312
Total Bars on Chart = 324
Highest Volume = 127773 @ 05/11/2008 10:00:00 PM
5 Minute decile 10 Volume > 47436 H-L Range = 6.99, C-O Range = 3.1
5 Minute decile 9 Volume < 47436 H-L Range = 5.31, C-O Range = 2.93
5 Minute decile 8 Volume < 39621 H-L Range = 4.35, C-O Range = 1.9
5 Minute decile 7 Volume < 32805 H-L Range = 4.49, C-O Range = 2.18
5 Minute decile 6 Volume < 28257 H-L Range = 3.97, C-O Range = 1.96
5 Minute decile 5 Volume < 24359 H-L Range = 3.6, C-O Range = 1.71
5 Minute decile 4 Volume < 20886 H-L Range = 3.54, C-O Range = 1.42
5 Minute decile 3 Volume < 17345 H-L Range = 3.02, C-O Range = 1.13
5 Minute decile 2 Volume < 14209 H-L Range = 2.71, C-O Range = 1.15
5 Minute decile 1 Volume < 11232 H-L Range = 2.27, C-O Range = 0.94
Lowest Volume = 5649 @ 04/11/2008 6:55:00 PM
Obviously that's too small a sample for the values to be used, but you can see that nothing magical happens when you go from DU to Slow, or from any one level to another.
IMHO the most important thing is to understand the general significance in terms of pace and relative strength of the levels you are using, whatever their precise values.
- palinuro