This is an FYI post for those that are using Pepe's final version of his JH Indicators for NT and is most certainly not a criticism of his work/coding.
Since the time he posted his tool, there has been an increased appreciation of LM's and LF's to the point where Pepe's protocol for initiating LM's and terminating both LM's and LF's is obsolete. The Pennant construction appears to be OK.
While many of the old pros may already know this, some of the newer people may not. A simple workaround for the LM's and LF's is to set the coloration of the formation = whatever the color of your chart background is. That way you can continue to use the Pennant stuff.
I am sure there are more sophisticated ways of addressing the deficits but as I've said elsewhere, I have the coding skills of a brick and little desire to improve on that situation. That being so others may wish to do a fix but one needs be sure that one has all the criteria for initiation and termination of LM' s and LF's before starting such a task.
lj
Since the time he posted his tool, there has been an increased appreciation of LM's and LF's to the point where Pepe's protocol for initiating LM's and terminating both LM's and LF's is obsolete. The Pennant construction appears to be OK.
While many of the old pros may already know this, some of the newer people may not. A simple workaround for the LM's and LF's is to set the coloration of the formation = whatever the color of your chart background is. That way you can continue to use the Pennant stuff.
I am sure there are more sophisticated ways of addressing the deficits but as I've said elsewhere, I have the coding skills of a brick and little desire to improve on that situation. That being so others may wish to do a fix but one needs be sure that one has all the criteria for initiation and termination of LM' s and LF's before starting such a task.
lj
.