So you go from having no rational reason to support passing wealth (but not debts!) to children who have done nothing to deserve or earn it, to wishing death on those who dare question your long held but never examined beliefs! Confirmation Bias like I've never seen the likes of.
Beating around the bush? I've asked repeatedly what moral or rational reason there is for children inheriting the money (but not debts) of parents despite them doing nothing to earn or deserve it. I began asking the question before you came along, and neither you or anyone else has been able to answer it. So far we've gotten "because it's always been that way", "because I said so" and more irrationally since we're discussing the rational behind a law, "because it's the law". So stop "beating around the bush", either you have a rational or moral reason for supporting the status quo of your don't. As I clearly pointed out to you, and apparently went over your head, this is a question of the morals or rational behind a law. Here in the U.S. at least, laws are passed by a democratic system and can be changed, they don't come on tablets from god that must not be questioned. You're no more "criminal" to ask for the moral or rational reason behind inheritance laws than you were "criminal" to ask for the moral or rational reasoning behind laws that allowed slavery, prohibited women or minorities from voting, prohibited mixed race marriages, or outlawed homosexuality....or the laws that prohibit marijuana use for that matter.
No millions and no children, so I probably don't know what I am talking about.
