First -- let's discuss the contract -- the 300 Million is the max spending cap, not the total contract amount. This means that each contractor is paid at a particular rate, the firm takes a cut. The maximum amount that can be spend over the designated time period for contractor pay, food, lodging, etc. is $300 million. Based on only supplying a couple hundred employees the contract is not likely to hit the cap, and fall short of it - which is common. The amount left on the contract at the end of the contract period can be rolled over to a new contract or the contract cancelled if the power is back on.
That's the standard contract process, question is - does your neighbor with 3 full time employees get a 300 million dollar contract on a regular basis or even irregular basis
Let's also discuss the audit clause -- it refers to avoiding a standard auditing relationship where the power company audits each expense line item in detail. This is bypassed due to the urgency of the situation and the issue controlled by setting a max amount on hotel & food expenses each day (effectively a per diem for food). Obviously a small contracting firm does not want to hire an entire financial and legal department to go through squabbles over expense report line items which are kicked back from a power company in their standard employee auditing procedure.
This is normal business procedure for small contract firms that do crisis work. What is the big issue you have with it.
That's nonsense, what has urgency got to do with auditing. If you are so small that you don't want to hire legal expertise, why are you getting such huge contracts?
This is not normal procedure, even Republicans are saying that. This is corruption and it will be exposed like Trump University.