Yeah yeah. Everything you don't understand you think is a lie.
Of course it's nothing to do with religious belief. That's my whole point. Yet you're the one quoting the bible and shouting atheist. Although I should thank you for the compliment.
"Natural rights are those not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government,.."
That's what you posted and what you won't face, only because of your blindsiding religious confusions . Even a Cardinal from your own superstitious persuasion explained that much to you, so you ignore it also.
It doesn't matter what you believe, natural law is inconsistent with any God.
Though ironically the reason you can't argue substance properly or rationally is due entirely to those religious beliefs.
Dodging the issue by calling upon the Declaration when it, nor the Constitution, uses the word "God" without qualification in a way which leaves meaning open to anything a person says it is, or isn't , is because you still can't actually deal with the issue that inalienable rights would not be any such thing were they based upon one.
Truly telling is how little reference there is to anything religious considering the number of theist zealots there must have been pushing their godforsaken christian faith at everyone and everything .
And here, instead of your usual reaction to shout liar like a moron you could have found this if you were being in any way balanced about the subject, instead of always choking yourself swallowing everything which fits your weird prejudices.
"natural god" & "their creator". Not capitalized. That comes later when the "Christians" print it up.
Now off you go and play in the mud your new fellow fuckwit friend has been so busy digging for you both.
.
