Are there different penalties for murder as a juvenile rather than as an adult in Michigan?
I think I posted that there are not. You can argue against that if you wish but start there.
So if "the adult penalties" are required upon a conviction of a juvenile, then what is the benefit that you wish to accomplish by having him processed and tried as an adult. I am not saying there are none. I am just asking what is motivating your comments. If he is is tried a juvenile, there could be more rules against holding him in solitary for example but that all ends if he is convicted and he sentencing seems to be where his heartburn is. Also, being tried as an adult does not preclude a insanity defense. That would not get him out of life lifelong or extensive confinement but might impact the nature of the facility where and circumstances where he would be confined.
What are you trying to accomplish within the laws already on the books in Michigan? Or are you just giving us a generic lecturette about how things should be different for juveniles regardless of what the law is?
Also, it is not necessarily true that lifelong confinement under adult (and juvenile) sentencing is meant to penalize, ie. punish. Although some people may want that, there is also just the basic desire to stop them from doing it again by keeping them in a controlled environment. And yes, it is or should be "the state's justice" where the state is representing the people. The defendant has rights too. But that is not who the state represents.
Yes. That point has merit too.
I have said only that they need to have something to say for themselves if the level of the concern they had or should have had on behalf of those under their care- ie the students- were perceived as being at risk but they did not report it to law enforcement or otherwise escalate it.
I am prepared to hear that they were acting upon things appropriately as well. But I want to hear it, whatever their statements are and what the issues were. I will adjust my thinking as we along but no one gets a pass. You also have to investigate their/the teachers/school officials communications with others- outside or before/after the meeting. They may have raised one level of concern in the meeting or tell prosecutors that they had did not expect this or that. Meanwhile the teacher from the meeting is telling other teachers down at the teachers lounge that "that kid scares the shiite out of me." I will just go where the facts take us, as the expression goes.
.It is really hard to imply an obligation or requirement on the school in these cases because as you pointed out before, should they panic and throw the kid out if he was looking at ammo on his phone? Schools also do not extend to monitor social media.
.
And as you mentioned, moving this shooting through the juvenile system doesn’t necessarily preclude full sentencing,.
Problem is wh at if that day is when the had a meeting with the parents to say that their kid is expressing concerning behaviors and probably should get some help and then he leaves and comes back and shoots up the school.
It is really hard to imply an obligation or requirement on the school in these cases because as you pointed out before, should they panic and throw the kid out if he was looking at ammo on his phone? Schools also do not extend to monitor social media.
Once clear case is if a fellow student told the principal the kid said he was going home to get his gun and the principal did NOTHING then their might be serious civil liability for lawsuits and schools have more money than parents of the shooters.
This whole spiel of cons trying to hold the school accountable as part of their whole war on school districts is absolutely chicken shit behavior
That was the first thing I thought.As I said several times above, the school officials are all set as long as they have good answers to predictable questions. If not......well......
Michigan school officials had legal grounds to search shooting suspect's backpack and locker but did not, prosecutor says
(CNN)School officials in Michigan had legal grounds to search shooting suspect Ethan Crumbley's backpack and locker but did not do so, Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald told CNN on Monday.
McDonald didn't say why such a search was not conducted, but noted, "We don't know exactly if that weapon was in his bag, where it was, we just know it was in the school and he had access to it."
When asked if school staff members might be prosecuted, McDonald replied to CNN's Brianna Keilar, "We haven't ruled out charging anyone."
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/06/us/michigan-oxford-high-school-shooting-monday/index.html
Why didn't the school search his back-back and locker? They have the right to do that. And they certainly had cause.