You mean when the US was still a developing (i.e., Third World) country?There was a time in US history when nearly all infrastructure was privately owned.
You mean when the US was still a developing (i.e., Third World) country?There was a time in US history when nearly all infrastructure was privately owned.
You mean the free and voluntary kind of people who, left to their own devices, historically caused panics? You mean those free and voluntary people?![]()
This is just a misunderstanding of how central banking works. First of all, the Fed is not a lender of last resort. Simply because it has nothing to lend. It has no savings.Care to let us know who would have bought all that debt the Fed now holds on its balance sheet?
I never meant to imply people were perfect, only that they should be able to rule themselves. I suspect you're just cracking jokes and don't actually feel otherwise, yes?
This is just a misunderstanding of how central banking works. First of all, the Fed is not a lender of last resort. Simply because it has nothing to lend. It has no savings.
If the Fed "buys" something and enlarges its balance sheet, it creates money out of thin air. You believe in free money? Look, money is never free. Someone is going to pay. And in the Fed's case, it's society paying through inflation.
The Fed creating money out of thin air has the same effect as the government raising taxes. In both cases, actual resources (goods and services) are diverted from the private sector and redistributed by the government.
You might think this type of central planning i.e. socialism has benefits. Yet it also creates massive issues. It manipulates the important price of money i.e. interest rates. It creates bubbles left and right, and enables zombie companies e.g. GME that loses hundreds of millions each year. It enables reckless lending that led to the housing bubble. Misallocation has a huge societal cost.
Let the market set interest rates and resources go to where they are best used, benefiting everyone. The Fed is the antithesis to the market.
As for the risk of governments going bankrupt, guess what, their spending has to be paid. Direct taxation is the honest and explicit way to pay for government spending. If citizens refuse to have their taxes raised for something, then that spending simply should not be done, as it was deemed not worth it.
Indirect taxation through inflation is the dishonest way to pay for government spending. Bankruptcy risk helps to properly assess interest rates. Without a central bank, this risk serves to force a government behave well, as it only enables a government to borrow when it's prepared to pay fair market interest rates.
I think what he is telling you is that you have a way too optimistic view of humans. Humans are inherently ill intended and selfish, incredibly selfish. Certain powers should not be put in the hands of the average person out there. Keyword: DANGEROUS

I was responding to your statement that without the Fed the US would go bankrupt. The Fed doesn’t print money — that’s the treasury. The Fed does create money in the form of reserves but this has little impact on inflation in the real economy. The US economy isn’t a zombie propped up by a single sector or export trade — it’s the worlds largest and richest economy for a reason. An incredibly diverse industrial set, vast resources, and a highly skilled workforce outcompetes most other countries in high margin businesses. Also, we host most of the worlds leading universities, have some of the best public school systems, and are well-liked and respected internationally.For the nth time I am now reminding you of the thread topic. The entire conversation is about a world without fed. Did you check who prints money today? It seems useless to discuss this further with you, you obviously either have no clue or aim to agitate.
This is a very naive view of the world IMHO and, I don't think you know me that well to boot.
I'm quite sure most people are idiots... including you and me. But, I have no desire to control them or strip them of their natural God given right to be that way.
I suspect if you give it more thought you'll probably agree. We could always throw you in jail or send you to a work camp if you don't agree... unless you think you never had ill intentions or acted selfishly?![]()
I was responding to your statement that without the Fed the US would go bankrupt. The Fed doesn’t print money — that’s the treasury. The Fed does create money in the form of reserves but this has little impact on inflation in the real economy. The US economy isn’t a zombie propped up by a single sector or export trade — it’s the worlds largest and richest economy for a reason. An incredibly diverse industrial set, vast resources, and a highly skilled workforce outcompetes most other countries in high margin businesses. Also, we host most of the worlds leading universities, have some of the best public school systems, and are well-liked and respected internationally.