Shocking New CNN Poll!

That was a tough situation for the democrats. Usually they are able to wait to complete the "recount" until they know how many votes they will need. Florida was a fluid situation with too many outsiders sticking their noses in, so they just didn't know how many votes to discover.

They refined their process in later elections, like the infamous Al Franken fraud. Now they have taken it even further. They just somehow get 100% of the registered "voters' in inner city precints to vote for their guy. and since they allow same day registration, they get astoundingly high percentages of voters to be registered. And just ignore those out of state busses full of blacks and mexicans who suddenly appear at polling places. Just democracy in action, folks.
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
That was a tough situation for the democrats. Usually they are able to wait to complete the "recount" until they know how many votes they will need. Florida was a fluid situation with too many outsiders sticking their noses in, so they just didn't know how many votes to discover.

They refined their process in later elections, like the infamous Al Franken fraud. Now they have taken it even further. They just somehow get 100% of the registered "voters' in inner city precints to vote for their guy. and since they allow same day registration, they get astoundingly high percentages of voters to be registered. And just ignore those out of state busses full of blacks and mexicans who suddenly appear at polling places. Just democracy in action, folks.
More...

Those damn democraps. Can't win without cheating.
 
Or on the other hand, were we to elect our Presidents democratically, Gore would have won. When Bush was going around saying we were democracy building in Iraq, after there were no WMD's found, I found it odd that he would champion democracy without first trying it out to see how he liked it. :D

(Personally I found it hard to vote for either Mr. Bush or Mr. Gore, as I considered them both weak candidates hardly qualified to lead a major nation.)
 
piezoe said:
Or on the other hand, were we to elect our Presidents democratically, Gore would have won. When Bush was going around saying we were democracy building in Iraq, after there were no WMD's found, I found it odd that he would champion democracy without first trying it out to see how he liked it. :D

(Personally I found it hard to vote for either Mr. Bush or Mr. Gore, as I considered them both weak candidates hardly qualified to lead a major nation.)
More...

I wonder what the outcome of a Gore v McCain race would have been.
 
LOL. If Obama wouldn't have won, trust me, the accusations of America not reelecting Obama because he's black would have been in full force.
 
Money Trust said:
LOL. If Obama wouldn't have won, trust me, the accusations of America not reelecting Obama because he's black would have been in full force.
More...

Every race, gender, and ethnicity voted in greater numbers for Obama than Romney, with the exception of old, "white", Southern men. So yeah, one could say a racial bias is there, if one wanted to.
 
Ricter said:
Every race, gender, and ethnicity voted in greater numbers for Obama than Romney, with the exception of old, "white", Southern men. So yeah, one could say a racial bias is there, if one wanted to.
More...


old, "white", Southern men

Oh, you mean Republicans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top