Shkreli at court

A quick Q7A recap for those who missed something:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rial-when-investors-didn-t-lose-quicktake-q-a

Relevant part:

"4. So if no one lost money, what’s the problem?
Think of it this way: In “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off”, Matthew Broderick’s character leaves his Ferrari with two parking valets. They take the car for a joyride and return it undamaged. No one was hurt. But they broke the law -- the valets stole the car."

I guess if the jury is sympathetic (kind of doubtful) they could send a note to the judge that yes, they find him guilty but they want the minimum penalty....
 
The numbers look entirely different when you a) filter by white collar crimes, and b) aggregate cultural background not religion.

I never attacked a religion nor made a case for or against a specific religion. I made the case that even when accounting for the fact that Jews are over represented in financial services (vs their representation in broad American society) Jews committing white collar crimes still stand out starkly. That's the entire point I made and Shkreli is Jewish, so is Madoff and so were countless other white collar crime perps. You can put me on ignore if you like but that does not change facts.
Is this chump the latest incantation of volpunter/Zzzz1? Dude, give it up already. Hint, when you keep getting banned it means that no-one wants you around. Not because of your race, we're not prejudiced like you, just because you're a jerk who makes everything you are involved in less. Go spew your crap to a mirror, you'll be talking to the only person interested in what you have to say.
 
Is this chump the latest incantation of volpunter/Zzzz1? Dude, give it up already. Hint, when you keep getting banned it means that no-one wants you around. Not because of your race, we're not prejudiced like you, just because you're a jerk who makes everything you are involved in less. Go spew your crap to a mirror, you'll be talking to the only person interested in what you have to say.

He obviously is. Is the new handle already banned ?
 
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/25/mart...rated-lawyer-said-his-attorneys-are-lazy.html

http://nypost.com/2017/07/25/shkreli-had-a-meltdown-as-alleged-ponzi-scheme-unraveled/

"The emails continue to pour in from backers looking to redeem their investments, Shkreli gets more cranky and abusive in his correspondence with Greebel, as they try to locate money to pay off investors.

“FIX THE F—ING ISSUE. THERE IS NO ISSUE. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THIS,” he writes in an email to Greebel. “Why can’t you do your job, it’s incredible"
 
Back
Top