Sessions Testimony

[Tsing Tao]

Translation

-put a supreme court justice in place (a vacant position he simply named and others decided to choose, none of which is Trumps accomplishment)
-closed on $400 billion sale to the Saudis (he armed a terror state from which a majority of deadly terrorists hailed from and that suppresses human rights and women's rights the most in the world)
-put more than a hundred Federal Court judges in place (with still hundreds of vacant positions in his own administration long into his term)
-reversed a ton of regulations on small businesses (none of which actually benefit small business nor normal people of average income, called middle class)
-put the Federal Gov in charge of the southern border (with no decrease in human nor drug trafficking)
-ran a lot of criminals out of the country (less than Obama did)

I know that much and I'm barely paying attention

The fact that he appointed a conservative supreme court justice was worth the entire election as far as I'm concerned.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

So you are saying that Trump is an insane narcissist, and most likely an idiot? Well I would have to agree with you on that one lol, 100%

But i also thought Obama fit the same traits, and Trudeau in Canada is definitely on the Trump level, but no one in the media ever pointed that out now did they?

The other day, this moron Trudeau, (The Canadian Trump) Created an entire sob story about how women need to win so he could look at his daughter and Hope that maybe just one day we could have our first Female, Canadian Prime Minister.

Even though its already happened, and it was a conservative.

Trudeau is literally the mirror image of Trump, instead of being a brash, in your face, bull in a china shop who knows nothing, Trudeau is a beta male cuck, who tries to answer everysingle question with some kind of SJW spin, and clearly gets pushed over by everyone.

I guess its somewhat of a good metaphor of Canada vs. the U.S.

In the U.S. you guys get a brash, in your face asshole who knows nothing, and apologizes for NOTHING.

In Canada we get an apologetic, wet behind the ears ass hole who knows nothing, and apologizes for EVERYTHING.

Couldnt think of a better metaphor for the 2 countries, than Trudeau and Trump, lol.

But back to the original point, its crickets from the media on Trudeau, and an all out assault when it comes to Trump. Trudeau is a BARTENDER atleast Trump actually ran some of the Bars, lol.

Trump and Trudeau are nothing alike. Trump and Kevin O'Leary, however, may have been separated at birth. Both have screwed investors for billions over the course of their careers and consider it to be an accomplishment. Thankfully, O'Leary backed out of the Conservative leadership race. (Maybe there is a part-time God.)

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Not sure about Trump, but i can say with 100% certainty that Trudeau was spawned from 2 eggs, there is no way a male was ever involved in that situation.

Remember your thread about how you wanted a woman to look at you the way a woman reporter looked at Trump?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...he-way-katy-tur-looks-at-donald-trump.310308/

Well that's the way that Ivanka Trump was looking at Justin Trudeau.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/s...ning-ivanka-trump-and-justin-trudeau-go-viral

Must be hard for you to reconcile...

 

[Frederick Foresight]

So what mental disorder do you have?

Wasting far too much time on a basket of Deplorables?

 

[dumpdapump]

Newt the sore loser, standing there with nothing in his hands. Pimping in the exact same way as Christie and Rudolph. Ah, I almost forgot to include the Alaskan ex governor.

Newt Gingrich: The media and elites still don't understand Trump

After nearly five months of his presidency, the liberal media and the Washington establishment still don’t understand Donald J. Trump.

President Trump is different from any political leader we’ve seen in the presidency – at least since Andrew Jackson (1828-36). As a result, reporters and those in the elite political class literally have no idea how to understand him. Each day, they are faced with a president who doesn’t fit the norms of politics as usual, and their persistent instinct has been to attack.

I have watched this hostility since then-candidate Trump announced his bid for the presidency at Trump Tower nearly two years ago on Understanding Trump, which was released Tuesday.

In fact, President Trump’s candidacy announcement, as I explain in the first chapter [CM2] of "Understanding Trump," is a great case study on how completely incapable the D.C. media insiders have been in comprehending the President – and why the American people elected him.

“Think about the torrent of criticism Trump received for his announcement event at Trump Tower. In addition to the intense criticism he received for what he said about people who are in the country illegally, Trump was mocked for ad-libbing his speech, boasting about his wealth, and his theatrics. The elites snubbed him, but his message resonated with normal Americans.

“Trump understood that since he was running as an outsider, the more he sounded like a politician, the more it undercut his message. So he abandoned his prepared remarks and spoke extemporaneously. This choice to go without the security of written text at such a big moment was, in fact, an act of extraordinary message discipline. The pundits accused him of ‘rambling.’

“Trump also understood that most Americans believed that their voices were not being heard, that the only people whom politicians listened to were ones who could cut big checks. So Trump spent a lot of time boasting about his wealth and promising to self-finance his campaign. In the following days, much attention was paid to whether Trump was really worth $9 billion, as he claimed, or if he was worth ‘only’ about $2 billion.

“The frustrated voters Trump was reaching out to heard only one word—billion. And they understood that they finally had a candidate who would not be bought.”

The media’s immediate reaction to President Trump’s announcement was full blown hostility. They couldn’t imagine that people would ever consider him a serious candidate. They didn’t care what he said. They didn’t care how the American people responded to his message. But within a few weeks, the media’s offensive had completely failed.

“After weeks of nonstop media criticism and declarations that his announcement in mid-June had been a disaster, the first polls were released that included Trump. After one month of Trump campaigning, he was leading in an average of all the polls, and he lost the lead only for one three-day period for the rest of the primary election.

“You would think this would have been cause for the media and establishment voices to pause and reconsider their assumptions about Trump, but the coverage and analysis has only gotten worse from there.”

Twenty-four months later, the hostility hasn’t changed a bit. The elite reporters and pundits remain baffled and predisposed to attack a president they don’t understand.

Just this month, a reporter asked me via email to comment on a story. The entire premise of the clearly biased article was that President Trump had been undoing Obama initiatives but not replacing them with anything of his own.

I responded by rejecting the entire notion.

Congress is grinding forward on health care, tax cuts, deregulation, infrastructure, and rebuilding the military – any one of which could define a presidential legacy. I reminded the reporter that it took nine months to pass President Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts and 18 months to pass welfare reform when I was Speaker.

Citing the current bull market being spurred by the surge in small business, entrepreneurial, and CEO confidence, I pointed out that in the first five months of the Trump presidency, the Trump effect has added @NewtGingrich.

 

[dumpdapump]

alright, that I can totally accept and that makes sense (though any other Republican nominee would have done as well). By omission I take it you value Trump's other claimed accomplishment at exactly nil.

The fact that he appointed a conservative supreme court justice was worth the entire election as far as I'm concerned.

 

[Tsing Tao]

alright, that I can totally accept and that makes sense (though any other Republican nominee would have done as well). By omission I take it you value Trump's other claimed accomplishment at exactly nil.

I'm not particularly thrilled with Trump's "performance" since he was elected, no. And I would have taken just about every other nominee from the GOP instead of Trump. But that wasn't the choice I had.

 

[dumpdapump]

fair. Now I just remain confused why you push back so hard on even the slightest possibility of Russian meddling and relationships between the administration and Russia. I am not siding with those who make false accusations and statements but you seem to be very convinced that the potential does not even exist while all American secret service agencies have come to the conclusion that Russia was heavily involved in influencing the US election outcome by spreading fake news and via hacking attempts. What proof do you have that all those agencies are wrong or lying?

I'm not particularly thrilled with Trump's "performance" since he was elected, no. And I would have taken just about every other nominee from the GOP instead of Trump. But that wasn't the choice I had.

 

[piezoe]

Newt the sore loser, standing there with nothing in his hands. Pimping in the exact same way as Christie and Rudolph. Ah, I almost forgot to include the Alaskan ex governor.

Gingrich is an enigma to me. He is well educated and smart, well versed on the Constitution, separation of powers, etc; yet he seems to have no aversion to chaos in politics and lacks, so far as I can tell, human empathy. But what is entirely missing from Newt Gingrich is integrity. The article you posted where Gingrich, without shame, pimps for a job in the Trump administration, is one of the most amazing distortions of truth I have ever read.

Gingrich is regarded as the father of acrimony in our present day Congress, the originator, in modern times, of the idea that democrats and republicans should not get along, and if they did, there was something amiss. He is the progenitor of government shutdowns and consequent inefficiencies, brinksmanship and coercion. He is the organizer of gangs of politicians bent on destruction of institutions for personal gain. Between Mitch McConnell and Newt Gingrich, I don't know which is the teacher and which the pupil. Both are terribly bad for the country.

 

[Tsing Tao]

fair. Now I just remain confused why you push back so hard on even the slightest possibility of Russian meddling and relationships between the administration and Russia. I am not siding with those who make false accusations and statements but you seem to be very convinced that the potential does not even exist while all American secret service agencies have come to the conclusion that Russia was heavily involved in influencing the US election outcome by spreading fake news and via hacking attempts. What proof do you have that all those agencies are wrong or lying?

I have no proof that these agencies were lying. But I follow the "innocent until proven guilty" belief that is supposed to be prevalent in our justice system. I have said - many times - that I would accept proof if it was given. Why is there none? After all this hoopla, there still is nothing at all showing any evidence. It is therefore, in my opinion, much more likely that this is an attempt to undermine, distract and discredit a sitting President so he cannot accomplish anything.