Not bashing,illustrating what a terrible strategy it is...
Sells naked calls for goober,doesnt manage his risk(delta hedge/close short call),then picks a completely arbitrary point to not only hedge a 50 delta call option,but overhedge and turns a bearish position into a bullish position,i.e short put.
Aa one poster illustrated,its steamroller city
Again if you read his post, his aim is to collect premiums without getting assigned. The covering is only happening when there is an imminent danger of getting assigned so it's not really a short put but a conditional short put conditional upon the fact that there is a change in market condition. If there is no change in market condition that it remains bearish, then there is no need to cover and he would be collecting the full premium.
But the risk is just like what he wrote 1) he won't be able to do it JIT and 2) he might not need to and the stock that he bought might end up tanking which is a bigger risk against which his short call is completely inadequate to protect. That's why I suggested for him to just do a spread with a long call. A short put is still a naked short position with still the downside unprotected.


Buying a call is closer to making sense
Buying a call is closer to making sense,except for the fact that he wont get his free lunch..
IOW,if the stock approaches short strike,the call he buys will cost more than the calls sold. He locks in a loss,obviously with less risk
The short put part is absurd.No reason to ride short deltas and then flip to .50 long at strike.
He still hasn't posted an example.
luncch