Sean Hannity is a client of Michael Cohen. Discuss.

Here is Business Insider's graphs from Edison Research:

58250662691e882c4e8b55e2-750-860.png


That shows income telling a completely opposite story about the poor voting for Trump.
 
Here is one that supports your theory, and also aligns with the previous chart (that stopped at college education). When going a step further and bringing in post graduate degrees, look at the significant change!

58250662691e8820038b61e9-750-634.png
 
Thanks for the image. TBH, the most striking is the HS or less. It's 12% right there. The post-grad is in line with what I'd guess if I had not seen it.

Apparently 58% of the educated are communists. ;)

My wife has a large, extended family of academics, many of which are postdocs. I can't name one who will admit to voting for Trump.

I have the greatest respect for those who have been consistently anti-Trump who align GOP. That says a lot. I come from a family of Kennedy-Dems.
 
destriero said:
Thanks for the image. TBH, the most striking is the HS or less. It's 12% right there. The post-grad is in line with what I'd guess if I had not seen it.

Apparently 36% of the educated are communists. ;)

My wife has a large, extended family of academics, many of which are postdocs. I can't name one who will admit to voting for Trump.
More...

I believe that 36% are communists! :)

The only thing I'd say, and this is just personal opinion, is that education does not always equate with wisdom! And I am not saying people voted for Trump because they were more wise. They voted because they believed he was a better choice, or a lesser of evils. It's easy to look at today and say how wrong that choice was, when it is impossible to prove how things would have been under Clinton.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I believe that 36% are communists! :)

The only thing I'd say, and this is just personal opinion, is that education does not always equate with wisdom! And I am not saying people voted for Trump because they were more wise. They voted because they believed he was a better choice, or a lesser of evils. It's easy to look at today and say how wrong that choice was, when it is impossible to prove how things would have been under Clinton.
More...


I was quoting the differential, not the nominal figure. It may not equate to wisdom, but they are correlated.

I will believe this, to my dying day, that it was a combination of the disenfranchised rust-belt voter that won due to the EC. Winning the popular by 3MM votes and losing the EC is unprecedented. By a factor of 6.
 
<This communist nearly lost his leg in France while working for this country (not mil/veteran). I can show pics of the scars related to the 100-odd stitches from the severed achilles and 15 broken bones if anyone is curious.
 
destriero said:
I was quoting the differential, not the nominal figure. It may not equate to wisdom, but they are correlated.

I will believe this, to my dying day, that it was a combination of the disenfranchised rust-belt voter that won due to the EC. Winning the popular by 3MM votes and losing the EC is unprecedented. By a factor of 6.
More...

Agree. But those are the rules.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top