Scientists warn the sun will 'go to sleep' in 2030 and could cause temperatures to plummet

Again Fraudshitforbrainscurrents stated:
"Let me repeat solar OUTPUT changes (how much energy the sun puts out) has never been the cause of the MAJOR (that means big for the righties) climate changes."

NASA stated:
"Understanding the sun-climate connection requires a breadth of expertise in fields such as plasma physics, solar activity, atmospheric chemistry and fluid dynamics, energetic particle physics, and even terrestrial history. No single researcher has the full range of knowledge required to solve the problem."

"Even typical short term variations of 0.1% in incident irradiance exceed all other energy sources (such as natural radioactivity in Earth's core) combined," he says."


Look, we know that you have the intelligence of a chimp. You do not have to keep proving it over and over again.

The problem with you righties is that you do not even know how dumb you are.

You are a great argument for more special ed teachers.
 
Look, we know that you have the intelligence of a chimp. You do not have to keep proving it over and over again.

The problem with you righties is that you do not even know how dumb you are.

You are a great argument for more special ed teachers.
no, we can handle truth and science, we just get really suspicious when all the communists believe in Man made global warming and all the capitalists deny it.
 
if you show any evidence that man is fucking up the environment you are accused of being a communist. If you dare question that evidence you are accused of being a denier.

seems pretty obvious to me. You can't burn in one day what it took the earth a million years to produce without fucking up something.
 
seems pretty obvious to me. You can't burn in one day what it took the earth a million years to produce without fucking up something.

Every CO2 molecule that gets released in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels came from the atmosphere in the first place. The net gain is zero.
 
WJK?

So the article I posted from 2006, from NASA, one of the researchers who was Drew Shindell, someone I thought was in agreement with warming, was wrong? It wasn't I, but he and his colleagues that stated reduced solar output may have resulted in a cooling period. Did you read the entire article before you threw my name in the mix? Any of it? You said "Solar output changes have never been the major driver of climate change". The article I posted directly disputes that, researched by one of your guys. Go read it, you might actually learn something.
 
Last edited:
no, we can handle truth and science, we just get really suspicious when all the communists believe in Man made global warming and all the capitalists deny it.


And the sad thing is that some people have no clue why that is. Are you one of them? They need to get a clue. Hint: The FF industry makes more than the GDP of most countries. Not to mention all of it's associated corporations. Like Koch Industries.
 
Is that why CO2 increases LAG increases in temp?

Really, try fucking reading you retard. I really hope that you have not bred. People as stupid you are should be sterilized.

Solar INPUT to the earth HAS been the cause of the MAJOR changes in the temps of the earth. These changes are due to orbital changes which cause variation of how much sun hits land vs sea. This initiates warming which releases CO2 which causes more greenhouse effect, which causes more warming, which releases more CO2 etc. It is these levels of CO2 that mostly determine the temps, after being nudged by the orbital changes.
 
So the article I posted from 2006, from NASA, one of the researchers who was Drew Shindell, someone I thought was in agreement with warming, was wrong? It wasn't I, but he and his colleagues that stated reduced solar output may have resulted in a cooling period. Did you read the entire article before you threw my name in the mix? Any of it? You said "Solar output changes have never been the major driver of climate change". The article I posted directly disputes that, researched by one of your guys. Go read it, you might actually learn something.


You may notice the word "major". I doubt he says it is the major driver. But I will look into his work further. But all this talk about solar output changes is just a red herring. The solar forcing effect of the rise in greenhouse gasses far exceeds, by orders of magnitude, solar activity changes.

"Solar output changes have never been the major driver of climate change".


 
Back
Top