Scientists warn the sun will 'go to sleep' in 2030 and could cause temperatures to plummet

wildchild said:
So this is yet another thread where FC is doing his typical copy and paste without giving any thought on the topic. The fact of the matter is FC does not even understand the theory that he is trying to defend. I have highlighted his lack of knowledge on countless threads. This tells me he is the product of propaganda and the public school system. He cannot come to grips with the fact that he was manipulated by the same left wing politicians who he lives and dies for. He does not have the critical thinking skills to see past the hysteria and is nothing more than a member of the democrat echo-chamber. Unfortunately, he is not alone in his ignorance and there are many FC clones who make up the base of the democrat party
More...


Oh I admit that for me to criticize the science is absurd. I am not a climatologist. That's why I read stuff like the link below. I suggest you try reading sometime. You might get confused.

Jem. the scientist who states the theory of man made global warming is here. Read thoroughly and you will find it. Ever find a respected climate scientist that denies it?

http://climate.nasa.gov/
 
you have become a desperate scared troll... you can't even produce a list of scientists stating man made co2 is causing warming... all you do is find restatements of political crap from the IPCC...

we are looking for science from scientists. you not only don't have the science you don't even have a list of scientists saying man made co2 is causing warming.

you have spent the last few years... lying to yourself and us.
 
Last edited:
yes... very good point and well written.
brave new world and 1984 both warned us there here more people like fraudcurrents than those who can think for themselves.

however this thread is not a total waste...
we have uncovered a new chink... they have few if any scientists stating man made co2 is causing warming...

they certainly can't produce proof of a thousand or anything close to a consensus or 97%.




wildchild said:
So this is yet another thread where FC is doing his typical copy and paste without giving any thought on the topic. The fact of the matter is FC does not even understand the theory that he is trying to defend. I have highlighted his lack of knowledge on countless threads. This tells me he is the product of propaganda and the public school system. He cannot come to grips with the fact that he was manipulated by the same left wing politicians who he lives and dies for. He does not have the critical thinking skills to see past the hysteria and is nothing more than a member of the democrat echo-chamber. Unfortunately, he is not alone in his ignorance and there are many FC clones who make up the base of the democrat party
More...
 
jem said:
yes... very good point and well written.
brave new world and 1984 both warned us there here more people like fraudcurrents than those who can think for themselves.

however this thread is not a total waste...
we have uncovered a new chink... they have few if any scientists stating man made co2 is causing warming...

they certainly can't produce proof of a thousand or anything close to a consensus or 97%.
More...

http://www.psychguides.com/guides/psychosis-treatment-program-options/
 
futurecurrents said:
Let me repeat solar OUTPUT changes (how much energy the sun puts out) has never been the cause of the MAJOR (that means big for the righties) climate changes.
More...

NASA stated(bold, color and underline mine):

"Could a modern day Maunder Minimum offset the warming influence of greenhouse gases or even throw us back into another little ice age? "It's extremely unlikely," said Lean, "but we won't know for sure unless we keep up and perfect our measurements."

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/glory_irradiance.html
 
Likely doesn't matter.

Thanks to Odumbo's Iran Nuclear Deal.... Iran will have started WW III... and planet earth will already be a burnt cinder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top