With all my respect to you, VSTscalper, I write this to you and hope it won't get you mad like you did to Daniel.a.
Thanks for posting you approach of trading, defining market conditions and the charts. It really helped me to get the ideas and focus on the simple things. But it seems like there is a frequent questions from the viewers including me.
Again, watching chart doesn't mean that the executions were real. What people want to see is the proof. A slight piece of proof that your signals are profitable, not in the backtest but in the REAL live market where all bunch of HFTs are, where there is a possibility the market hits your limit order but won't get you filled.
You keep saying that why is it so hard for people to acknowledge your algos don't need a backtest to prove its profitability, yet why is it so hard for you to understand without actual trading result, you can't claim that your algo is profitable.
It seems like you are keep saying same things over and over again but there is a reason why people are asking you the same thing over and over again, the real result.
The repertoires you give are just the same and repeats. Do you know how many people sent me a PM, telling me that every time when they asked for the real result, you just went away?
All the net daily goals, or gotta go to drive, or go to shopping or those big money clients, etc doesn't makes your backtest result real nor proves your signal is profitable.
Also, MC is faster than human trading decision yet you still don't go full auto???
You could watch over what it's been doing but putting order looking at the arrows?????
You can say that it is your playground but what are the forums and communications for? Isn't it two way, back and forth, discussing?
Probably I've seen all the post you posted on not only this forum but also the others as well.
There is no way that you do not understand what the others(Daniel.a, Trader30, Simplemelike) are asking you for. You definitely know how to code, how to trade, how to backtest and what are the traps that you could possibly get while backtesting and forward-testing. But you keep avoiding revealing your backtest settings, which crucially affects the profitability, also haven't revealed the actual broker report or real time trading result.
If the range bar is huge enough it doesn't really matter that much, but when you do the scalp, and the range bar is small, it is so important because when the market hits certain price doesn't mean your orders were filled. And I guarantee you already know these. Also, when the market moves super fast, possibility of your orders won't get filled might go up.
Following your thread, watching your claims, I just wonder whats the hidden propaganda behind all these. Must be related to the money but who knows.
Thanks for posting you approach of trading, defining market conditions and the charts. It really helped me to get the ideas and focus on the simple things. But it seems like there is a frequent questions from the viewers including me.
Again, watching chart doesn't mean that the executions were real. What people want to see is the proof. A slight piece of proof that your signals are profitable, not in the backtest but in the REAL live market where all bunch of HFTs are, where there is a possibility the market hits your limit order but won't get you filled.
You keep saying that why is it so hard for people to acknowledge your algos don't need a backtest to prove its profitability, yet why is it so hard for you to understand without actual trading result, you can't claim that your algo is profitable.
It seems like you are keep saying same things over and over again but there is a reason why people are asking you the same thing over and over again, the real result.
The repertoires you give are just the same and repeats. Do you know how many people sent me a PM, telling me that every time when they asked for the real result, you just went away?
All the net daily goals, or gotta go to drive, or go to shopping or those big money clients, etc doesn't makes your backtest result real nor proves your signal is profitable.
Also, MC is faster than human trading decision yet you still don't go full auto???
You could watch over what it's been doing but putting order looking at the arrows?????
You can say that it is your playground but what are the forums and communications for? Isn't it two way, back and forth, discussing?
Probably I've seen all the post you posted on not only this forum but also the others as well.
There is no way that you do not understand what the others(Daniel.a, Trader30, Simplemelike) are asking you for. You definitely know how to code, how to trade, how to backtest and what are the traps that you could possibly get while backtesting and forward-testing. But you keep avoiding revealing your backtest settings, which crucially affects the profitability, also haven't revealed the actual broker report or real time trading result.
If the range bar is huge enough it doesn't really matter that much, but when you do the scalp, and the range bar is small, it is so important because when the market hits certain price doesn't mean your orders were filled. And I guarantee you already know these. Also, when the market moves super fast, possibility of your orders won't get filled might go up.
Following your thread, watching your claims, I just wonder whats the hidden propaganda behind all these. Must be related to the money but who knows.