Sarah Palin- Healthcare Czar

Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

If "other spending" could be cut then guess what: It would ALREADY be cut. Do you see the Pelosi Congress cutting social programs? Or education costs?


Faster troop withdrawal may save $1 trillion

By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Sep 5, 2009 10:15:43 EDT

A speedier withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan would shave $1.1 trillion off the budget in the next decade, a new congressional budget projection says.

That would be a sizeable cut in defense-related spending from 2010 through 2019, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates at $7.4 trillion.
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/09/military_troopwithdrawals_cost_090309w/


interesting how close the one trillion in war spending we could save is to the estimated 1.1 trillion cost of healthcare reform over 10 years.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Lotta black folks up there in the Dakota's?

I notice this phenomenon on ET. The diversity plus dudes are always from huckin and jivin' places like Toronto, Lake Tahoe, the Dakota's, Australia. Pretty easy to be Joe Outreach when you live in a state with less blacks than a medium sized Chicago housing project....
not that many blacks but this state is home to many indian reservations that live in the same,or worse, economic class as the inner city blacks. racism is rampant here too.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Are you not arguing that health costs to the Federal budget could be offset by spending cuts?

Not exactly. I was countering this assertion, from Palin's piece: "And we know that allowing government health-care spending to continue at current rates will only add to our ever-expanding deficit..."
 
Quote from vhehn:

you need more than that for regulation. otherwise you get situations where schyster companies sneak in wording that eliminates their exposure.
there are already shady companies selling health insurance through infomercials. if you look into these they sneak wording into their policy that limits their exposure to almost nothing. the consumer buys these products thinking they are covered and pay for years only to find out the coverage is worthless.

"I don't know about you, but when I see the term "low cost," I immediately assume the product is of very little use and limited quality. And when I see the Infomercial king Billy Mayes pitching a health insurance policy...well...I know there's something wrong. And there is.

The policy he's peddling is like Swiss cheese. Full of holes...and full of something else as well! Consider these policy provisions on the 1100 Series policy:

$100 application fee. Sorry...but you NEVER should pay an application fee.
Only $1000 of surgery coverage per year. Seriously...I'm not kidding!
Limit of $20 per blood test of lab test.
Limit of $220 for an MRI.
Only $1100 of your hospitalization charges are covered per year.
Anesthesia charges limited to $250 per surgery (that's about 10 minutes, folks!).
NO outpatient surgery coverage.
Inpatient hospital expenses such as lab work, blood tests, medications etc...are NOT covered!

And it keeps getting better! For Ohio residents, the cost is NOT $50 per month, as you might expect. Try $159 per month and a whopping $269 per month for an entire family.

At those prices, you should get a food dehydrator, a knives and cutlery set, a pasta maker, a pocket fisherman and an autographed picture of Lebron James."

http://healthinsuranceatoz.com/beware-of-health-insurance-infomercials/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7d85T4OfqA

Sounds horrible, but isn't that company already subject to state regulation?

I think I would like the government to mandate a uniform disclosure template, so consumers could compare apples to apples. What will end up happening though is that various special interests will lobby to have coverage for their particular specialty mandated. Then we all end up paying a fortune so that expensive stays at addiction centers is covered,etc.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Lotta black folks up there in the Dakota's?

I notice this phenomenon on ET. The diversity plus dudes are always from ...

"Always"...

Really?? And can a person be "anti-anti-diversity", without being pro-diversity?
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

If "other spending" could be cut then guess what: It would ALREADY be cut. Do you see the Pelosi Congress cutting social programs? Or education costs?


Maybe you were in Canada during the debates:

"That's (McCain's proposed budget cuts) using a hatchet to cut the federal budget," Obama said. "I want to use a scalpel..."

I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that the cost of a educating a student has risen FAR MORE than the cost of hospital patients the past three decades. (tuition at my grammar school was $850 in the 70's-it's 12k today) Is there a Democrat alive complaining about skyrocketing school costs? Of course not. Not when 1 in 10 delegates at the DNC are members of the NEA.

Pabst, you are like Rush. When you hit a topic, there is not a lot left to say on the subject.

You make a great point about surging education costs. Obama wants the government to underwrite more of the cost of college, which of course will result in tuition and fees going up even more. The universities will just pocket that extra money.

Democrats have no interest in holding down education spending. In fact, they take pride in increasing it. Anyone hwo thinks we can;t save a ton of money on education has not seen new schools lately. Public high schools have state of the art health clubs, pools, artificial turf athletic fields, etc. They spent $500k in Dc to build an artficial turf soccer field for a middle school. A middle school! This is the worst school system in the country, where they are chronically short textbooks,etc, despite the Department of Education being larded with hundreds of highly paid "administrators." And they can afford that kind of extravagance?

Stepping onto a university campus is like going to an expensive resort. They have every known extravagance from athletic facilites to golf courses to hundred million dollar facilities for sports teams, etc etc. Professors barely do any workand spendmost of their time trolling for grants. Administrators are paid like investment bankers.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Pabst, you are like Rush. When you hit a topic, there is not a lot left to say on the subject.

You make a great point about surging education costs. Obama wants the government to underwrite more of the cost of college, which of course will result in tuition and fees going up even more. The universities will just pocket that extra money.

Democrats have no interest in holding down education spending. In fact, they take pride in increasing it. Anyone hwo thinks we can;t save a ton of money on education has not seen new schools lately. Public high schools have state of the art health clubs, pools, artificial turf athletic fields, etc. They spent $500k in Dc to build an artficial turf soccer field for a middle school. A middle school! This is the worst school system in the country, where they are chronically short textbooks,etc, despite the Department of Education being larded with hundreds of highly paid "administrators." And they can afford that kind of extravagance?

Stepping onto a university campus is like going to an expensive resort. They have every known extravagance from athletic facilites to golf courses to hundred million dollar facilities for sports teams, etc etc. Professors barely do any workand spendmost of their time trolling for grants. Administrators are paid like investment bankers.

like rush,its bs. i dont think education costs went up 50% in the last two years. that is what my blue cross insurance has gone up
 
We do not know that about government health-care spending. It does not follow, because it implicitly assumes a premise, that health-care spending is the only government spending.

Actually we do. Medicare spending rose 30% faster than the rest of HC spending during last few years. So while maggot POTUS (and the rest) tell us government option will cut costs, government option is already major factor in driving HC costs higher.

Regardless, is it actually possible that there are people (adults!!) who believe that government will be able to cut HC costs without affecting negatively (in any way) health-care????

Whatever you are smoking pass it over to me, I'll sure like a hit!!!
 
Quote from Mercor:

Sarah is controlling the debate anyways.
Without her death panels health care passes, no Obama tomorrow night. She has saved the union.

All I had to do is read the very first post and typical unintelligent claim above by the resident ET "P&R" forum clown . . . and I just KNEW that it had to be from Mercor.

Palin for 2012
She has saved the Union!!!
:D
 
Back
Top