San Jose to require gun owners to carry liability insurance

Cuddles said:
This of course will be struck down by this SCOTUS as you can't tax a right enshrined in the constitution, just wish this SCOTUS had any shame after the two decisions last week.
More...
Just want to say for the record that I have no guess as to whether the requirement will stand.
 
UsualName said:
Looks like some in California have been reading the forum. Good.

I don’t necessarily know about the mechanics of their plan being that they are creating a public fund but they are on the right track.

I’m sure there will be some legal challenges and even some losses but working out the kinks is to be expected.

While San Jose is claiming guns create a financial liability for citizens and their right to tax is the constitutional mechanism as an appropriate remedy to relieve tax payers but that’s just lawyer prattle. The end result is prove you still have your guns which is the key to getting gun violence under control in the long term.

Good for San Jose. They’ve advanced an appropriate remedy for states and the federal government to work with.

https://sanjosespotlight.com/san-jose-to-make-gun-owners-carry-insurance-pay-into-public-fund/
More...


Good
 
KCalhoun said:
Bad idea imho. Taxing law abiding firearm owners for no good reason.

How about taxing criminals instead?

Democrats = "if it moves, tax it"
More...


Actually they aren't taxing gun owners enough.A gun owner should held civilly and criminally liable if their gun gets into the hands of a criminal and used in a crime.
 
Tony Stark said:
Source
More...
Why cant you do a little work and make your case against a post
You as a child, I will hold your hand to show you how to contribute like an educated adult

Step 1: Google www.google.com
Step 2: type in question "26% of murders don't involve firearms."
Step 3 : Read ..............this is how children learn

In 2019, 14,861 people in the U.S. died from firearm homicide, accounting for 37% of total deaths from firearms. Firearms were the means for about 75% of homicides in 2018.
 
Tony Stark said:
Source
More...
It varies year to year. 26% is the most recent data available.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/249783/percentage-of-homicides-by-firearm-in-the-united-states/
upload_2021-7-5_12-38-0.png
 
Mercor said:
Why cant you do a little work and make your case against a post
You as a child, I will hold your hand to show you how to contribute like an educated adult

Step 1: Google www.google.com
Step 2: type in question "26% of murders don't involve firearms."
Step 3 : Read ..............this is how children learn

In 2019, 14,861 people in the U.S. died from firearm homicide, accounting for 37% of total deaths from firearms. Firearms were the means for about 75% of homicides in 2018.
More...

Stalking me again:rolleyes:
 
Mercor said:
Why cant you do a little work and make your case against a post
You as a child, I will hold your hand to show you how to contribute like an educated adult

Step 1: Google www.google.com
Step 2: type in question "26% of murders don't involve firearms."
Step 3 : Read ..............this is how children learn

In 2019, 14,861 people in the U.S. died from firearm homicide, accounting for 37% of total deaths from firearms. Firearms were the means for about 75% of homicides in 2018.
More...
Not sure how they do it in the sticks, but we city-folk cite our own sources, when we are making our own assertions.

Otherwise, I could tell you a bunch of bullshit, and send you googling for days.

Then, when you think you've found the source I used, and you write your long-winded response; I could simply tell you that that's not the source I used. And send you googling again.

Yeah, silly, isn't it. Has a MAGAtard feel to it.

If you make an assertion; the onus is on you to support it.
https://www.google.com/search?q=do+I+have+to+cite+my+sources
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top