S&P: Russia's rating now CCC-

[cesfx]

The Dawn and M.W.

Your arguments are fucking pathetic.

You also stink... just registered and defending your mother Russia action. Fuck off both of you.

 

[cesfx]

Nobody is defending Putin but there is a right way to fight and stop a war and there is a wrong way. Seizing personal assets of civilians without investigations or trials is not right. Two wrongs do not make one right.

In a previous post, you said that it made more sense to send troops that taking stuff from the rich. Those rich who support what you support. You are a joke and I am blocking your ass, and your comrade M.W.

 

[cesfx]

I will put on ignore any new registered motherfucker who defends Putin with illogical out of context bullshit.

 

[TheDawn]

There is very little distinction between government and oligarchs in Russia. It is a gang of criminals at the top, some give themselves government titles, some don't bother.

Do have any evidence? Did you see them doing that in front of your eyes? If this is what you suspect, why not bring them to trial??!! Launch an investigation and prosecute them in a trial to examine their criminal acts and examine how and whether their assets were gained through crimes so we know for sure!! And if their assets were found to be gained through criminal activities, then seize them. This is what we do when we are governed by rules of law.

I am usually very much against politics interfering in stuff like sports and arts. But this is not "politics". "Politics" is rhetoric, negotiations, trade, treaties, pressure, etc. What Russia is doing is not "politics" anymore. Unprovoked military aggression is not "politics". This is far beyond politics. So the sanctions are not political. They are practical. They are there to isolate, block and make a pariah a country that claimed that it can shit all over the international law and no one can do anything about it. Well the West is doing something about it, both the governments, private companies and non-governmental organizations.

Praticalness shouldn't be used as justification for violating people's fundamental rights to property even if they are the "enemies". And even on the definition of "enemies", "enemies" to whom?? Enemies to you? To United States? Have they attacked you or your family? Have they attacked United States? It's Putin on behalf of the Russian government that has launched an invasion of Ukraine, what have they done? What are they guilty of? Being Russian and being rich and having some spare assets?

 

[TheDawn]

I will put on ignore any new registered motherfucker who defends Putin with illogical out of context bullshit.

We are not defending Putin!! Ok go ignore us, you imbecile!

 

[TheDawn]

In a previous post, you said that it made more sense to send troops that taking stuff from the rich. Those rich who support what you support. You are a joke and I am blocking your ass, and your comrade M.W.

Yes send troops to fight the Russian army to stop the invasion. This is what people do in a war? People send soldiers to the frontline and fight??

Why do you hate the rich so much? Cuz you can't make it in your trading to become rich?? That's the real reason, isn't it? LOL Pathetic!!

 

[terr]

Do have any evidence? Did you see them doing that in front of your eyes? If this is what you suspect, why not bring them to trial??!! Launch an investigation and prosecute them in a trial to examine their criminal acts and examine how and whether their assets were gained through crimes so we know for sure!! And if their assets were found to be gained through criminal activities, then seize them. This is what we do when we are governed by rules of law.

The criminal gang took over Russia. And as long as they were confined to Russia, no one touched them. But when you start an unhinged unprovoked military invasion in the middle of Europe, all bets are off.

Praticalness shouldn't be used as justification for violating people's fundamental rights to property even if they are the "enemies".

Rabid dogs are not treated the same as normal dogs, even if the normal dog has fleas.

 

[TheDawn]

The criminal gang took over Russia. And as long as they were confined to Russia, no one touched them. But when you start an unhinged unprovoked military invasion in the middle of Europe, all bets are off.
Rabid dogs are not treated the same as normal dogs, even if the normal dog has fleas.

But you didn't really examine these dogs to see if they are really rabid dogs. How do you know they are rabid dogs? Did you see the fleas? How do you define "normal dogs"? Where do you draw the line?

 

[M.W.]

So, to appease a few consumers' feelings and emotions you justify the destruction of the lives of an entire race? No discrimination whether that Russian associates with Putin or not? Regardless of whether that Russian lives in Russia or next door in your neighborhood? Wow, that's a great ethical concern you display here.

It means that dealing with a rogue pariah state erodes the "good will" asset of the company, and the company makes the decision not to erode it. Which is exactly how it should be.

 

[TheDawn]

Mind you, the opposing side is not reasonable. So how do you deal with an unreasonable, old despot?

You go in and arrest him and prosecute him as a war criminal in a war crimes trial, the same as you did for Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosovich, Mohammed Morsi, all the Japanese war generals from WWII... Why are we doing differently this time?

I will tell you, cuz Biden doesn't have what it takes.