Russian Hacking Questions

[gwb-trading]

so mine is wrong and yours is true. Hmm, how about we settle that we both don't know shit, nor does Tsing Tao or anyone else until we, the plebs, is being informed.

Go read the press you will find all the evidence that is needed including quotes from officials who were targeted.

Let me make a broad generalization (which is backed by the network security community) -- Democrats know nothing about network security and have very poor practices. Republicans have much better network security and follow the rules.

 

[Zzzz1]

wait, did you not say the press was biased and manipulated? And yes, this is a very broad generalization, without exception only idiotic people make such completely false and meaningless generalizations.

Go read the press you will find all the evidence that is needed including quotes from officials who were targeted.

Let me make a broad generalization (which is backed by the network security community) -- Democrats know nothing about network security and have very poor practices. Republicans have much better network security and follow the rules.

 

[gwb-trading]

wait, did you not say the press was biased and manipulated? And yes, this is a very broad generalization, without exception only idiotic people make such completely false and meaningless generalizations.

I general take the quotes coming from the intended victims as the truth in the matter. especially when the stories were widely reported across CNN, Fox, NYT, etc.

 

[Tsing Tao]

ha, you keep on pressing everyone who does not agree with you for facts, facts, facts, yet you keep on coming up with those funny insinuations and linguistic twists such as "in fact, it is likely", "I think it was said", "not sure,...", "seems ...probably". You know what that smells like?

Yeah, those pesky facts. I mean, why do you need those if you're going to make outlandish claims against another sovereign nation?

Further, no appointed intelligence officials have made comments, which is exactly the problem. Some "anonymous" sources in the background are hinting at things, yes I agree, it is preposterous that those issues are not full-on investigated and the House is not frequently updated on who hacked what and exactly when. But hey, does that not speak volumes about your chaotic intelligence apparatus? Maybe Trump needs to "drain the swamp" in the same way than he drained the Washington D.C. swamp when he hired all those establishment politicians, lobbyists, and oil CEOs into his cabinet.

No appointed officials have made comments?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...y-clinton-blames-russia-putin-wikileaks-rele/

"Director of National Intelligence, headed by James Clapper" who is an appointed official by the Obama administration and heads the national intelligence community, was behind the claim Hillary used to say Russia was behind these "hacks". Sorry, wrong again.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

The EPA isn't the only agency where Trump needs to get a list of people who have been overly politicized. Obviously the CIA needs a top to bottom house cleaning. As with the IRS, a big budget cut would also tend to remind them why they need to stay out of partisan politics.

 

[Zzzz1]

damn right, the goal is to undermine the legitimacy of the election of Donald Trump. And it looks like this issue will not go away. Yippee, let's get the popcorn out, the movie is about to begin. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the show.

It is beyond ironic to see the leftwingers in the media and democrat party, ie pretty much all of them, hissing "how dare you" at Trump for doubting the CIA. Same deal with their sudden outrage over leaking.

What we have here is a thinly veiled attempt at staging a pre-election coup. The media, democrat big shots, establishment republicans and the CIA working together against their common foe, Trump.

I have to wonder if there are not plenty of people at Langley (CIA HQ.) who are wringing their hands over this obvious politicization of the agency. This is guaranteed to generate plenty of blowback.

 

[Zzzz1]

What you claim James Clapper said and what you earlier referred to "these claims" is completely different. Another of your twisting facts.

No appointed officials have made comments?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...y-clinton-blames-russia-putin-wikileaks-rele/

"Director of National Intelligence, headed by James Clapper" who is an appointed official by the Obama administration and heads the national intelligence community, was behind the claim Hillary used to say Russia was behind these "hacks". Sorry, wrong again.

 

[Tsing Tao]

What you claim James Clapper said and what you earlier referred to "these claims" is completely different. Another of your twisting facts.

How is it "twisting" to show you an appointed official made comments on the topic you just stated "no appointed official" commented on? I understand it may be inconvenient for you that I show direct evidence detailing how wrong you were, but "twisted" isn't the appropriate word.

I chalk this up to the fact that you're not American and English is probably your second language. It's OK.

 

[traderob]

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

@JBurtonXP 20h20 hours ago


Now that we know Putin is behind password-change phishing scams, we must investigate his role in those fake Nigerian prince e-mails as well.

•